City Government
Senator Hancock Introduces Bills to Restrict Coal Exports Through Oakland
Citing health and environmental threats posed by increased coal shipments in and out of California, Senator Loni Hancock on Friday introduced four proposed laws to restrict exports of the pollution-inducing fuel source.
“I was shocked when I first learned that a development project on the former Oakland Army Base would export millions of tons of coal to China and other countries,” said Hancock during a press release at her district office in downtown Oakland.
“As the state senator for this area, I cannot sit by while the residents of West Oakland face their own Keystone Pipeline. Truth is, the proposed coal depot is so problematic that I believe it warrants a multi-bill response,” said Hancock.
Noting that the City of Oakland is debating a large publicly funded project for exporting coal, Hancock (D-Oakland) said she felt compelled to introduce legislation to “close loopholes in the law and ensure that other cities will not face similar problems in the future,” according to a press release from the senator’s office.
Joining Hancock in supporting her bills were environmentalists, labor leaders, community activists and Kevin De León, Senate Pro Tem of the California Senate and author of last year’s measure bill to fight global warming, Senate Bill 350.
“Continuing to invest in coal is a bad bet for Oakland,” De León said in a statement. “We can certainly find better uses of limited public funds than to invest in a dying industry that brings a host of public health and environmental drawbacks.”
Other speakers in support of Hancock’s bills included Derrick Muhammad, a local labor leader and treasurer for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU Local 10), Nate Henderson, an Oakland high school student with the New Voices Are Rising Project of the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment, and Margaret Gordon, a community organizer with the West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project.
According to the senator’s press release, “Each cited environmental concerns and a seeming blind eye toward industries that bill themselves as ‘job creators’ with apparent disregard to the impact on the health and well-being of residents, workers and the environment.”
“For a worker who would be handling coal every day, the proposal to bring coal in to Oakland is a drastic and unhealthy situation,” Muhammad said. “Coal export poses substantial dangers to workers at the site and the coal dust that would be produced also poses a serious danger to workers.”
Margaret Gordon said the nine million tons of coal each year that would be brought through Oakland would have a negative impact on the city, the region, the state and the far West.
“Although Sen. Hancock’s bills cannot retroactively fix the situation in Oakland, I am glad that they bring light to the negative impact that coal would have in our lives,” Gordon said.
Hancock said two of her bills specifically take on the proposed terminal in Oakland. The other two add additional restrictions on the transportation of coal through California.
SB 1277 declares that the transportation of coal through West Oakland “would present a clear and present danger to the health and safety of Oakland residents as well as the workers that would handle the coal.” This bill also prohibits the shipment of coal through the Oakland facility, which has been paid, in part for, with state funds.
SB 1278 would require an environmental impact review from any public agency that has authority in approving any portion of a project relating to the shipment of coal through Oakland.
On a state level, SB 1279 would prohibit the use of public funds to build or operate any port that exports coal from California. It also applies to any port near disadvantaged communities.
SB 1280 requires port facilities that ship bulk commodities and receive state funds to prohibit coal shipments or fully mitigate the green-house gas emissions associated with the combustion of the coal.
“The City of Oakland needs to act on its own to prohibit shipping coal and protect the community,” Hancock said, emphasizing that the bills would not work retroactively.
“There is a provision in the development contract that allows the city to consider the health and safety of the surrounding community and the workers. I urge the City Council to use its authority and prohibit coal,” said Hancock.
“Frankly, it’s not acceptable to have the City of Oakland build a large new facility to export coal to places like China where people often must cover their faces or stay inside to avoid breathing dirty air,” she said.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of March 15 – 21, 2023
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of March 15 – 21, 2023

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Bay Area
COMMENTARY: Oakland’s Plan to Rehouse Wood Street Residents Can Only Fail a Self-Reliant Community
A large community of unhoused people have been living in an empty lot at 1707 Wood Street. The city of Oakland would like to remove them as soon as possible so they can build 170 units of affordable housing there. If you live in Oakland or spend any considerable amount of time here, then you have probably seen this encampment at least a few times. The West Oakland community is estimated to include 200-300 individuals. They support each other in accessing food, water, medicine, clothing and other basic living necessities.

By Daisha Williams
Post News Group Intern
A large community of unhoused people have been living in an empty lot at 1707 Wood Street. The city of Oakland would like to remove them as soon as possible so they can build 170 units of affordable housing there.
If you live in Oakland or spend any considerable amount of time here, then you have probably seen this encampment at least a few times. The West Oakland community is estimated to include 200-300 individuals. They support each other in accessing food, water, medicine, clothing and other basic living necessities.
In an interview with a city of Oakland official, a spokesperson for the community, John Janosko, described a bike ride that they all took to Sacramento last October.
“That bike ride was amazing for me. Everyone had a chance to bond,” he said. “The people in Sacramento were so welcoming and it was my birthday that morning and they had a cake at 1 o’clock in the morning when we finally rolled in.”
This bike ride was planned, organized and executed by people who have banded together to survive in a system that doesn’t seem to care if they live or die and made the best of those circumstances.
Before the city of Oakland can begin building affordable housing, they are required to provide shelter for the people currently living there. The initial plan was to simply provide cabins near the lot for the people to live in. On Feb. 3, the U.S. District Judge William Orick said that the city could move forward with disbanding this unit only for that ruling to be reversed a week later, on Feb. 10.
Oakland Assistant City Administrator LaTonda Simmons said that the delay was due to issues finalizing the contract for the cabins as well as “IT network challenges.”
The city hasn’t released a timeline detailing when they expect to begin moving people out. Simmons commented on the delay in a statement. “We believe this minor delay will result in an even more supportive cabin program for the Wood Street community.”
Current plans for shelter for the residents include cabins with 30 beds each, which are expected to accommodate 100 people. There will also be 29 parking spaces available for people living in RVs with electrical hookups and bathrooms available.
Furthermore, the city expects to have 100 more beds available at other shelters in Oakland, which will effectively divide the community that the Wood Street residents have created for themselves.
But it is also the case that the amount of affordable housing that the city plans to build in this lot will not be enough to accommodate the people currently living there and what the city considers “affordable housing” is not affordable for many people.
Another hindrance for the community is the difficulty of qualifying for affordable housing.
One hurdle is that it is necessary to provide proof of income, which makes it even less accessible.
Another is that applicants must pass a criminal background screening. Since homelessness itself has been criminalized, many people currently living in the lot will not be able to pass that screening and qualify.
Many of the people now living at the Wood Street lot were residents of a neighboring encampment that was cleared out about a year ago. That they are back on the street can indicate that the city’s processes for quickly finding housing for people in dire need are ineffective.
This is summarized best by what James Vann, co-founder and advisor to the Oakland Homeless Advocacy Working Group, said in response to Judge Orwick’s decision.
“The calamity that will follow is another instance of the City’s failure to acknowledge the homelessness crisis as real and to implement timely actions to assure adequate accommodations and health and safety of the affected unhoused residents.”
Sources for this news article include the Mercury News, the City of Oakland and the Post News Group.
Bay Area
Stockton Fire Department 2023 Safe and Sane Fireworks Program: Application Period for Fireworks Sales Permit Lottery Open Until March 31
Fireworks classified as “Safe and Sane” by the State Fire Marshal are approved for sale and use in the city of Stockton. Safe and Sane Fireworks sales are limited to 30 qualifying nonprofit organizations that submit a completed application to the City of Stockton and are then selected to receive a sales permit through a lottery process.

STOCKTON, Calif. – Fireworks classified as “Safe and Sane” by the State Fire Marshal are approved for sale and use in the city of Stockton. Safe and Sane Fireworks sales are limited to 30 qualifying nonprofit organizations that submit a completed application to the City of Stockton and are then selected to receive a sales permit through a lottery process. The application period for the Fireworks Sales Permit Lottery opens today, March 1, 2023, and ends March 31, 2023, at 4:30 p.m. The lottery drawing will be held May 10, 2023.
For a copy of the application packet and details about the selection process and fees, please visit www.stocktonca.gov/Fireworks or contact the Stockton Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division, 345 N. El Dorado St., at 209-937-8271. Office hours are Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.; alternate Fridays, 8 a.m. – 4:30 p.m., except March 3, office closes at noon; and closed every other Friday, including March 10 and 24, 2023.
All news releases can be found on the City of Stockton website. www.stocktonca.gov/news Please follow us at www.facebook.com/CityofStockton, www.twitter.com/StocktonUpdates, and www.YouTube.com/StocktonUpdates.
-
Activism3 days ago
Oakland Post: Week of March 15 – 21, 2023
-
Activism1 week ago
Oakland Post: Week of March 8 – 14, 2023
-
Activism2 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of March 1 – 7, 2023
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of February 22 – 28, 2023
-
Digital Issues4 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of February 15 – 21, 2023
-
Bay Area2 weeks ago
Help Save North Oakland Missionary Baptist Church, the 2nd oldest Black Church in Oakland
-
Bay Area4 weeks ago
Unapologetically Black Mayor of Bay View Hunters Point Charlie Walker Leaves SF Legacy
-
Bay Area4 weeks ago
Mayor Sheng Thao Announces Police Walking Patrols, Other New Safety Measures