Connect with us

Uncategorized

Western Addition Residents Launch City’s Biggest Rent Strike Since 1978

Published

on

 

By The Save Midtown Tenants Committee

 

Three short weeks ago, a group of tenants at Midtown Park Apartments in San Francisco’s Fillmore District launched the city’s biggest rent strike in nearly 40 years, highlighting the ever-growing tensions over affordable housing in the Western Addition neighborhood.

 

On Aug. 3, more than 60 households showed up at the office of their property manager, San Francisco-based Mercy Housing, to protest rent increases ranging from 30 percent to 300 percent.

 

At a press conference led by Midtown’s long-time legal representative, civil rights attorney Joshua Arce, residents and their supporters announced that they would withhold their monthly rent until the city Rent Board, and potentially a court of law, render a final decision on whether the rent increases violate the city’s rent control regulations.

 

At first glance, there is no question that Midtown should be protected by rent control, which would prohibit rent increases that average 100% for the 65 households participating in the rent strike.

 

The 139-unit affordable housing community was built in the 1960s, just as Redevelopment Agency bulldozers prepared to rip the Western Addition apart, and residents received rent increases limited to the amount allowed by the 1979 San Francisco Rent Ordinance, until only recently.

 

There is a twist in the Midtown rent control debate, however: Midtown is owned by the City and County of San Francisco.

 

City leaders have asserted that Midtown, San Francisco’s only city-owned affordable housing site, is thus exempt from rent control and eviction protections that would otherwise be unquestioned if Midtown’s owner were a private entity.

 

Midtown’s attorneys at the AIDS Legal Referral Panel and Brightline Defense have filed for a determination of the rent control question at the Rent Board hearing on Sept. 15, and an appeal to the California Superior Court is likely regardless of what the Rent Board decides.

 

Supporting the Midtown residents are Dr. Espanola Jackson, Aboriginal Blackmen United, Our Mission No Eviction, the Holly Courts Public Housing Resident Council, Laborers Union Local 261, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 648.

 

A weeklong series of actions followed their Aug. 3 rent strike announcement, including protests at the Mayor’s Office Housing, rallies at the corner of Geary and Divisadero streets, visits to the offices of Mayor Ed Lee and District Supervisor London Breed, and broad media coverage on television and in print.

 

Midtown residents’ attorney Arce has presented the residents with a blueprint for a rent strike that he had worked on with civil rights legend Ambassador Andrew Young.

 

“I had the chance to spend an evening with Ambassador Young in which he told me about a successful rent strike that he organized with Dr. King in Chicago in 1966,” recalled Arce. “We tailored a plan that we thought would work at Midtown in 2015.”

 

The Midtown rent strike, which began on a Monday, ended in victory four days later on Friday, when the City and Mercy agreed to postpone rent increases for all 65 families pending the outcome of the rent control determination process. In the meantime, families have the ability to petition for rent decreases and re-evaluations.

 

“Each and every family had to stay strong each and every day of the rent strike,” said Midtown Board Vice-President Donald Griggs, a Midtown resident for the past 33 years. “We’re all concerned about our neighbors and together we have the strength to win. Plus we have ourselves one heck of a lawyer in Joshua Arce.”

 

Griggs recounted “The last time San Francisco saw a rent strike of this size was the 1978 Ping Yuen Public Housing Apartments tenants rent strike.. Based our success in 2015, The Midtown residents are clearly ready to handle any challenge that may come our way when the San Francisco Rent Board renders its decision on September 15”.

 

The Save Midtown Tenants Committee is a coalition of Midtown residents, their community allies, and labor unions committed to safe and secure housing and empowerment for the 139 households of Midtown Park Apartments.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Not Just a Southern Issue: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

OAKLAND POST — Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions.

Published

on

Shutterstock

By Edward Henderson, California Black Media

U.S. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) whose district spans parts of Los Angeles County, joined fellow CBC member U.S. Rep. Troy Carter (D-LA-2) for a May 21 briefing with Black media outlets in California. 

The lawmakers highlighted what they describe as a mounting threat to Black political representation resulting from an April 29 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections under the federal Voting Rights Act.  

Kamlager-Dove and Carter warned that the decision, which narrowed the role of race in redistricting, is already reshaping congressional districts across the South and undermining Black voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice.

“While we are a super blue state, we have far to go when it comes to Black representation; we tend to take that for granted,” Kamlager-Dove said of California, noting that the Golden State has the fifth largest Black population in the country and only has three Black members of Congress.   

“While I support building coalitions, we have to make sure that as a Black community we are not yielding our power,” she added.

Calling the fight “not unique to the South,” Carter urged Black communities nationwide to recognize the broader implications of the legal and political battles unfolding in Southern legislatures and courtrooms. 

The Supreme Court ruling centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the portion of the law that prohibits voting systems or district maps that dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. For decades, Section 2 allowed civil rights groups to challenge district maps that weakened Black political representation even when lawmakers did not openly state discriminatory intent.

Now, advocates fear that standard has fundamentally changed. 

“You have to have smoking gun evidence,” said Mitchell Brown, senior voting rights counsel at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, during a recent media briefing hosted by American Community Media on May 15. “Legislators are not going to say the quiet part out loud.” 

The implications could stretch far beyond congressional elections, Brown said.  

Section 2 protections have historically applied not only to U.S. House districts, but also to state legislatures, school boards, county commissions, judgeships, and local governing bodies. Voting rights advocates warn that weakening those protections could reshape political representation throughout the South, particularly in states with large Black populations. 

“This is not just a Southern issue,” said Amir Badat, manager of Black Voters on the Rise and voting special counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Badat described the current moment as part of a much longer historical pattern. 

Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions. 

“This is the same move,” Badat said.

Advocates also emphasized that the consequences of weakened voting protections extend into everyday life. 

Local elected offices such as school boards, city councils, county commissions, and judgeships often determine funding priorities, public safety policy, education standards, and infrastructure investments.

“These are not abstract numbers,” Badat said. “These have real political consequences and policy consequences on people’s day-to-day lives.” 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rest in Peace: A.M.E. Pastor and L.A Civil Rights Icon Cecil “Chip” Murray Passes

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94. “Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Published

on

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94.

“Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Murray oversaw the growth of FAME’s congregation from 250 members to 18,000.

“My heart is with the First AME congregation and community today as we reflect on a legacy that changed this city forever,” Bass continued.

Murray served as Senior Minister at FAME, the oldest Black congregation in the city, for 27 years. During that time, various dignitaries visited and he built strong relationships with political and civic leaders in the city and across the state, as well as a number of Hollywood figures. Several national political leaders also visited with Murray and his congregation at FAME, including Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

Murray, a Florida native and U.S. Air Force vet, attended Florida A&M University, where he majored in history, worked on the school newspaper and pledged Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity.  He later attended Claremont School of Theology in Los Angeles County, where he earned his doctorate in Divinity.

Murray is survived by his son Drew. His wife Bernadine, who was a committed member of the A.M.E. church and the daughter of his childhood pastor, died in 2013.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Court Throws Out Law That Allowed Californians to Build Duplexes, Triplexes and RDUs on Their Properties

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional. Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

Published

on

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional.

Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of the cities, pointing out that SB 9 discredited charter cities that were granted jurisdiction to create new governance systems and enact policy reforms. The court ruling affects 121 charter cities that have local constitutions.

Attorney Pam Lee represented five Southern California cities in the lawsuit against the state and Attorney General Rob Bonta.

“This is a monumental victory for all charter cities in California,” Lee said.

However, general law cities are excluded from the court ruling as state housing laws still apply in residential areas.

Attorney General Bonta and his team are working to review the decision and consider all options that will protect SB 9 as a state law. Bonta said the law has helped provide affordable housing for residents in California.

“Our statewide housing shortage and affordability crisis requires collaboration, innovation, and a good faith effort by local governments to increase the housing supply,” Bonta said.

“SB9 is an important tool in this effort, and we’re going to make sure homeowners have the opportunity to utilize it,” he said.

Charter cities remain adamant that the state should refrain from making land-use decisions on their behalf. In the lawsuit, city representatives argued that SB 9 eliminates local authority to create single-family zoning districts and approve housing developments.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.