Connect with us

Bay Area

Environmental Review of Housing Plan to Begin

The Marin County Board of Supervisors held a joint session with two agenda items with the Marin County Planning Commission on April 12, one focused on programs and policies related to the mandated update of the Countywide Plan and one specifically about parcels of land where new housing could be created. It’s all part of the Housing Element update of the Countywide Plan for the years 2023-2030. The State of California requires every municipality to update its Housing Element every eight years.

Published

on

Marin working to meet needs and state mandates with Housing Element update

Courtesy of Marin County

After accepting more input about long-term housing plans for Marin County’s unincorporated areas, the Marin County Community Development Agency (CDA) is submitting a list of properties to a consulting firm to begin environmental analysis to identify the best places for future housing.

The Marin County Board of Supervisors held a joint session with two agenda items with the Marin County Planning Commission on April 12, one focused on programs and policies related to the mandated update of the Countywide Plan and one specifically about parcels of land where new housing could be created. It’s all part of the Housing Element update of the Countywide Plan for the years 2023-2030. The State of California requires every municipality to update its Housing Element every eight years.

The session about programs and policies centered on the preservation of existing housing, including short-term rental properties and accessory dwelling units, or ADUs. Another cited goal was to take steps to address longstanding vacant homes and maximize the use of all homes for longer-term residents rather than temporary vacationers. In rural and coastal West Marin, a popular vacation spot, about 10% of all properties are used as short-term rentals, eliminating their possible use as much-needed living spaces for the local workforce.

The Housing Element update, which needs to be completed by January 2023, will explore ways to achieve goals to expand housing options and address the need for more affordable housing. Marin County is among the most expensive counties in the country in which to live.

The second session about specific housing sites resulted in a list that will be submitted for environmental review. As it works to comply with the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA), planners worked with residents and elected officials to identify parcels throughout all five supervisorial districts that could serve as housing locations. The County has been directed to plan for at least 3,569 new units in unincorporated areas during the eight-year cycle that begins in 2023.

Two larger properties on the list have been designated as regional housing sites that could handle comparably large numbers of RHNA units and lessen the overall number of properties that could be converted to housing:

  • the undeveloped area just north of Novato city limits on the west side of Highway 101 near Mount Burdell, loosely called the Buck Center property, and;
  • the undeveloped flatlands east of 101 and the Marinwood neighborhood called the St. Vincent property.

Otherwise, the County is focusing on infill — vacant properties adjacent to developed ones — rather than creating homes on parcels that have never been developed. Choosing sites near existing developments, business districts, and transportation hubs aligns with longstanding goals in adapting for gradual population growth.

Land owned by schools, houses of worship, businesses, nonprofits, private owners, and the county government is open for consideration as part of the County’s update. RHNA units must be distributed among all income categories, from extremely low to above moderate.

The environmental review, set to take place this spring and summer, will examine how any proposed housing development might affect nearby traffic, schools, quality of life, and be vulnerable when faced with environmental hazards. A joint session of the Board and Planning Commission is tentatively set for June 14 for a public review of the programs and policies portion of the Housing Element update. In August, a draft of the environmental impact report (EIR) will be made public and open for comment.

CDA staff has mentioned at previous meetings that defying the RHNA mandate and planning for little or no growth of housing choices will result in less local control in project reviews and more streamlined project approvals. The consequences of noncompliance with housing requirements could be stiff. If a jurisdiction does not meet its housing goals, it becomes ineligible for state funding to serve local transportation needs and may be subject to statewide streamlining rules, which allow for housing development with limited public review process. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has a new division that is designed to enforce accountability with plans to meet housing needs.

Questions and comments can be emailed to staff and phone inquiries can be made to (415) 473-6269. Regular updates can be found on the Housing and Safety Elements update webpage.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of July 24 – 30, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of July 24 – 30, 2024

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of July 17 -23, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of July 17 -23, 2024

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Bay Area

Op-Ed Senate Bill 966 Threatens Health Equity in East Bay

My East Bay community is struggling to get by. A proposed State Senate bill would set us back even further. Serving the East Bay community has been my life’s work and my greatest joy. After leaving the Bay Area to complete my seminary, I returned home to found The Community Church in Oakland. From the outset of my time as the church’s pastor, I have been guided by the belief that my service must extend beyond the pulpit, because the health and economic needs of my community are so great. Our church has organized free food banks, COVID-19 testing clinics, and a housing and re-entry program for those suffering from addiction.

Published

on

Rev. Dr. Lawrence E. VanHook.
Rev. Dr. Lawrence E. VanHook

By Rev. Dr. Lawrence E. VanHook

Special to the Post

My East Bay community is struggling to get by. A proposed State Senate bill would set us back even further.

Serving the East Bay community has been my life’s work and my greatest joy. After leaving the Bay Area to complete my seminary, I returned home to found The Community Church in Oakland.

From the outset of my time as the church’s pastor, I have been guided by the belief that my service must extend beyond the pulpit, because the health and economic needs of my community are so great. Our church has organized free food banks, COVID-19 testing clinics, and a housing and re-entry program for those suffering from addiction.

Through my service, I have seen the challenges that our community members are facing. Oakland, my  hometown,  has the third-highest rate of violent crime in the state. The local economy is strained. Oakland-based businesses are leaving our community because they’re struggling to get ahead.

Both East and West Oakland has disproportionately high rates of respiratory illness due to heavy air pollution. While our local efforts have brought some aid to those in need, we are also counting on our state elected officials to help us address the systemic health disparities afflicting the community.

Chief among the health concerns of community members is having reliable and affordable access to prescription drugs. Equitable access to medications gives us the peace of mind that we can keep ourselves and our families healthy and safe. Our community should not have to choose between paying rent or purchasing prescriptions.

Unfortunately, rather than taking action to combat soaring prescription drug prices, some California lawmakers are pushing legislation that could raise patient costs at the pharmacy counter.

The Legislature is currently considering SB 966, a bill backed by special interests that would undercut the few tools we have to keep prescription drug costs contained, letting big drug companies increase their prices, profiting on the backs of working families – some of whom already live paycheck to paycheck.

SB 966 would target the fundamental programs through which small businesses, unions, and government health programs are able to offer their employees and members quality and affordable healthcare. Millions of Californians rely on these plans to obtain essential medications at the lowest-possible cost.

The bill would make it illegal for employers and unions to incentivize the administrators of their prescription drug plans to negotiate for the lowest possible cost for prescriptions. Right now, small businesses and unions can choose to pay these administrators more for taking on big drug companies and securing discounts – a choice that will be outlawed under this bill.

As a result, employers will have no leverage to stop big drug companies from setting sky-high prices, disproportionately impacting working families.

As these health costs quickly add up, employers will have little choice but to pass the increases down to their employees. That means California patients will see higher healthcare costs and co-pays.

From my perspective, most concerning is that the bill would exacerbate the health disparities impacting my community and other underserved populations. If SB 966 becomes law, the most vulnerable may be forced to skip prescription doses, stop filling their prescriptions, and avoid essential care.

By rejecting this cash grab by big drug companies, our state elected officials can send a clear message that they stand with the community, patients, and working families.

We cannot afford SB 966.

Rev. Dr. VanHook is the founder and pastor of The Community Church in Oakland and the founder of The Charis House, a re-entry facility for men recovering from alcohol and drug abuse.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Activism12 hours ago

Oakland Post: Week of July 24 – 30, 2024

#NNPA BlackPress2 days ago

#NNPA BlackPress3 days ago

PRESS ROOM: Reparations Movement Partners Globally Mourn the Passing of U.S. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee

#NNPA BlackPress4 days ago

OP-ED: Vice-President Kamala is Ready!

#NNPA BlackPress4 days ago

OPINION: Checkmate! In the High Stakes Game of Political Leadership, Congresswoman Maxine Waters Illustrates She is Master Queen

#NNPA BlackPress4 days ago

OP-ED: Patients Over Profits: Insurance Companies Must Provide Americans the Care They Deserve

#NNPA BlackPress4 days ago

PRESS ROOM: Trailblazing Women Explain How Early Education Fueled Their Success

#NNPA BlackPress5 days ago

BREAKING NEWS: President Joe Biden Announces He Will Not Seek Re-Election

Activism6 days ago

Oakland Post: Week of July 17 -23, 2024

#NNPA BlackPress7 days ago

IN MEMORIAM: Democratic Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee Dies at 74

Dr. John E. Warren contends that it is the race of Biden’s successor, Kamal Harris, that is the real issue underneath the fearmongering about the president’s age. Courtesy photo.
Commentary1 week ago

COMMENTARY: President Biden, The Constitution and Race

#NNPA BlackPress1 week ago

PRESS ROOM: AFSCME’s Saunders at NAACP Labor Luncheon: We Must Vote for Candidates Who Believe, As Dr. King Said, that ‘All Labor Has Dignity’

Rev. Dr. Lawrence E. VanHook.
Bay Area1 week ago

Op-Ed Senate Bill 966 Threatens Health Equity in East Bay

iStock photo.
California Black Media1 week ago

New California Laws Require High School Classes on Drug Education, Financial Literacy and Ethnic Studies

Dr. Stephany Powell, a former Los Angeles Police Department officer and current expert on human trafficking survivors, speaks with the media about a bill that would help lock up individuals who buy sex from trafficked children. On Powell's right is Sen. Shannon Grove (R-Bakersfield), who co-authored SB 1414 with (not pictured) Sens. Anna Caballero (D-Merced) and Susan Rubio. CBM photo by Antonio Ray Harvey.
Antonio‌ ‌Ray‌ ‌Harvey‌1 week ago

Lawmakers Incensed by ‘Watering Down’ of Language in Child Sex Solicitation Bill

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.