Connect with us

City Government

OP-ED: Mayor, City Council Should Heed Residents’ Call for a Department of Race and Equity

Published

on

By Ise Lyfe

 

Auditioning. That’s what comes to mind when I think about the dynamic in the media and tone of local and federal governments as it relates to police brutality and holding law enforcement accountable for the perpetual murder of Black men.

Black men and women are on a constant and relentless audition for their humanity in America. After a Black man is murdered by a police officer, a peculiar thing begins to unfold and the auditioning begins.

First, the officer(s) is swept off into ambiguity, their names and histories all hidden and protected. This seems to be the pre-production to the audition and then, the real show begins.

Then, the life of the victim previous to his death at the hands of the officer(s) is put on trial, or audition. For example: “Was he in a gang?” “Was their marijuana in his system?” ”Did he graduate from high school?” “Has he ever been to prison?“

All of these questions are emitted from news media and they reflect the thinking of a large share of Americans. These questions are all offsets of the real question and feeling Americans subconsciously have when they learn of an unarmed Black man or woman being murdered:

“Is this person human enough for me to care about them being murdered by the police?”

Phase two of the audition comes along when the victim’s family is shuffled in front of cameras as they weep and try to compose themselves to talk about the murder of their loved one to a nation that is listening to them as long as a game isn’t on or Mayweather isn’t fighting…This nation stares into TV and computer screens and casually assesses the family, and in this part of the audition, America is deciding if the family of the deceased is a family that we should care about or is it safe to assume they bred a thug that was a loser and probably got what he had coming.

More questions are triggered as the family emerges:

“Why was he walking on that part of the road?” “Why was he standing in front of that store?”

Then comes the final phase of the audition…How Black communities and their allies respond to the injustice is scrutinized for the final part of the audition:

“Is their rage valid?” “Should they be blocking traffic as they protest?” “Should they be protesting at all?”

 

Jesse Jackson (who is so irrelevant to Black youth that if you showed a room full of Black kids a picture of Jesse and Billy D. Williams, they wouldn’t know the difference) said their rioting is uncalled for – is he right?

Black people who have been living in this country for four centuries and have been legal citizens here for a century and a half still can’t get a benefit of the doubt on their humanity!

Furthermore, their right to speak out against their oppression is ridiculed by America and largely perceived as an annoyance, sans the ratings and advertising dollars network news coverage rakes in from it all.

Residents and community organizations in Oakland, CA are asking their city government for an institutional solution to the disparities the city is plagued with. These disparities range from policing and safety to education and access to healthy foods.

The proposed solution is a city funded Department of Race and Equity.

The notion and plan was first authored by newly reelected City Councilmember Desley Brooks, who this past November was selected by Oakland voters to her 4th term as the leader of East Oakland’s District 6.

As she started her 13th year in office at the beginning of 2015, Black America was holding up a new slogan for the newest phase of humanity auditioning, Black Life Matters. They needed to remind America of that, you see…

Councilmember Brooks marched with protestors and was in agreeance with the provocative and peaceful protest against the slaying of Mike Brown and Kevin Garner. These peaceful protest shutdown Bay Area Rapid Transit for hours and brought media attention to a community demand for justice.

From her appointed office, she took on the challenges of racial injustice by laying the groundwork for a department of race and equity, which would be unprecedented in Oakland, both one of the nations most diverse and inequity riddled cities. Marketing ploys and PR driven travel articles about Oakland are criminally omissive about what the city really reflects.

Right now, an African-American child from East Oakland can expect to live 15 years less than a white child living only a few miles away.

That’s roughly equivalent to the difference between Iceland and Iraq. In 2006 Samoans had the highest arrest rate of any racial ethnic group in Oakland and Laotians in Oakland suffer from disproportionately high arrest rates.

 

Less than half of Latino and African-American male students graduate from high school.

“We all have our roles to play, and as elected officials we have to go a step beyond listening to our constituents and be imaginative and useful with the resources available to us,” said Desley Brooks. “The city government cannot and should not be spectators to the community’s call to end inequity. We should be partners and allies in this process. I’ve been a politician for sometime and one thing is for sure – if the city doesn’t put money behind it, it is all just lip service. This is why I’m asking our city to offer money and an institutional framework to end inequity in Oakland, rather than make empty promises and hold stale redundant meetings.“

Though Brooks initiated this call for a department of race and equity, she is far from a lone ranger in the cause. In just two months the campaign for the department has gotten over 31 major endorsements including but not limited to the NAACP, the Director of Alameda County Transit, Alameda County Central Labor Council, Asian Pacific Environmental Network , East Bay Asian Youth Center ,Communities For A Better Environment, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, and Causa Justa. Also, petitions both physical and online have tallied several hundred endorsements from residents across the city saying that this is something they want. Oakland residents even started a Facebook page dedicated to this effort.

You would think all of this support and outcry would move Oakland’s mayor, Libby Schaaf, and the other city council members to join the effort to bring this office into fruition, but it hasn’t. In fact, none of the other city council members elected by Oakland voters have endorsed or even acknowledged officially what so many Oaklanders in their districts are asking for. Councilmember Brooks has asked for a mere $500,000 from the City’s 2 year 1 BILLION DOLLAR budget to open the department. That is only 0.05% of the budget. The rest of the city officials seem to be balking at it or treating it like some radical notion. Meanwhile Mayor Schaaf is allocating $194,000,000 to the Oakland Police Department and the city spends $10,000,000 a year to subsidize the Oracle Arena, home of the Golden State Warriors.

Neither Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan nor Councilmember Noel Gallo were available when contacted for this article.

On April 22nd while holding a Twitter forum about the budget she will be submitting on April 30, 2015, Mayor Schaaf’s response to her constituents asking her to include a department of race and equity in the city budget was, to me (and others), insensitive and displaying of how out of touch even the mayor might be about equity:

“We love to cut ribbons but I would ALSO love to see us improve the structures and services we already have.”

Unfortunately, Mayor Schaaf seems to be unaware that Oakland has no structures or services within its body that address racial equity for her to improve…

Oaklanders living under putrid inequity conditions are not asking for a “ribbon to be cut”, their asking for the boot of police brutality and the noose of institutional racism to be cut from their necks.

Insiders have revealed that Mayor Schaaf, under pressure from residents who support the call for a department of race and equity, has included $100,000 to spread across 2 years to pay a “Race and Equity Consultant” to build an “Equity map” in Oakland. One, taking $100,000 out of a $1,000,000,000 for racial equity in Oakland is offensive and appalling. Two, by law, a consultant or contractor could not be managed or held accountable by the city. This is antithetical to what community members are asking for. Basically, this offering from the mayor outsources the responsibility of making Oakland equitable.

In researching all of this I thought I’d make a call to one of the bright minds and city actions that inspired Councilmember Brooks to call for a department of race and equity in Oakland.

I spoke with Donte James, Esq., Director of Portland, OR’s Office of Equity and Human Rights, to get a feel for what his office has accomplished and what it has done for Portland. To put race in context in the state of Oregon: When Oregon was granted statehood in 1859, it was the only state in the Union admitted with a constitution that forbade black people from living, working, or owning property there. It was illegal for black people even to move to the state until 1926.

“This department has only been in existence for a little over 3 years,” said James, “but in that time we’ve changed hiring policies, we’ve band the box so that people who have been formerly incarcerated do not have to check a mark on job applications that they’ve been convicted of a crime, and we facilitate a complete budget equity tool for every department in our city to be sure that resource allocation is guided by an ethic of equity. I’m really proud of the racial equity strategic plan our office has developed here. It essentially is a living document for every city department that unfolds over a 5-year period of time. This is the tool that helps to make sure that hiring, purchasing, contracting, outreach, and a sleuth of other important quality of life markers in Portland are equitable.”

He added, “We also work with the police bureau so that the interview and hiring of police is more character oriented and not just questions about a potential officers training or strategy index.”

Because of the push back or non-responsiveness Oakland residents are getting from their mayor and council members, I asked James if there was any initial push back on starting the office in Portland:

“Oh, absolutely – the main push back being around the funding of it. We were getting financial push back but we were only asking for about 1% of the entire city budget- 1.5 million of 300 million. Some people said that focusing on race creates more problems than it fixes. These of course were unfounded ideas. And you know, I really have to give a lot of credit to our mayor, Mayor Charlie Hales. He’s always addressed the inequities in Portland and stood behind our office unapologetically and that is necessary. I report directly to him and that’s what this is all about, accountability and structure,” James said.

(For added context, I want to note that Portland’s Mayor is a 59 year-old White man)

I was blown away listening to Mr. James, followed by even further disappointment and confusion in Oakland’s elected officials.

I’m from East Oakland’s Brookfield neighborhood. Unfortunately, if you grew up where I did, you’re not just from Oakland – you survive Oakland. We do not get to live in Oakland, we are surviving there. You survive the racially inequitable Oakland Unified School District, you survive your neighborhood with no grocery store, you survive skyrocketing rents and the new trampling inhabitants, and of course (if you’re lucky) you survive contact with over zealous and undertrained police officers.

There are two Oakland’s in Oakland, no matter how many trendy coffee and apparel shops you see popping up. What will define the new mayor is her willingness and performance to end the last twenty-year side stepping of racial issues in the city. She could start with an errata to her budget that provides in a tangible way the development of a Department of Race and Equity in Oakland.

In the meantime while we are all waiting, people of various backgrounds in the city are waking up and getting ready for their next humanity audition.

 

Ise Lyfe (HBO Def Poetry, Huffington Post, New York Times) is an award winning conceptual artist, justice advocate, author, and actor. Additionally, he’s one of the leading Spoken Word artists in America with a broad fan base stemming from appearances on several commercial market platforms and his social and political commentary.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

S.F. Black Leaders Rally to Protest, Discuss ‘Epidemic’ of Racial Slurs Against Black Students in SF Public School System

Parents at the meeting spoke of their children as no longer feeling safe in school because of bullying and discrimination. Parents also said that reported incidents such as racial slurs and intimidation are not dealt with to their satisfaction and feel ignored. 

Published

on

Rev. Amos C. Brown, president of the San Francisco NAACP and pastor of Third Baptist Church. Photo courtesy Third Baptist Church.
Rev. Amos C. Brown, president of the San Francisco NAACP and pastor of Third Baptist Church. Photo courtesy Third Baptist Church.

By Carla Thomas

San Francisco’s Third Baptist Church hosted a rally and meeting Sunday to discuss hatred toward African American students of the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD).

Rev. Amos C. Brown, president of the San Francisco NAACP and pastor of Third Baptist Church, along with leadership from local civil rights groups, the city’s faith-based community and Black community leadership convened at the church.

“There has been an epidemic of racial slurs and mistreatment of Black children in our public schools in the city,” said Brown. “This will not be tolerated.”

According to civil rights advocate Mattie Scott, students from elementary to high school have reported an extraordinary amount of racial slurs directed at them.

“There is a surge of overt racism in the schools, and our children should not be subjected to this,” said Scott. “Students are in school to learn, develop, and grow, not be hated on,” said Scott. “The parents of the children feel they have not received the support necessary to protect their children.”

Attendees were briefed last Friday in a meeting with SFUSD Superintendent Dr. Matt Wayne.

SFUSD states that their policies protect children and they are not at liberty to publicly discuss the issues to protect the children’s privacy.

Parents at the meeting spoke of their children as no longer feeling safe in school because of bullying and discrimination. Parents also said that reported incidents such as racial slurs and intimidation are not dealt with to their satisfaction and feel ignored.

Some parents said they have removed their students from school while other parents and community leaders called on the removal of the SFUSD superintendent, the firing of certain school principals and the need for more supportive school board members.

Community advocates discussed boycotting the schools and creating Freedom Schools led by Black leaders and educators, reassuring parents that their child’s wellbeing and education are the highest priority and youth are not to be disrupted by racism or policies that don’t support them.

Virginia Marshall, chair of the San Francisco NAACP’s education committee, offered encouragement to the parents and students in attendance while also announcing an upcoming May 14 school board meeting to demand accountability over their mistreatment.

“I’m urging anyone that cares about our students to pack the May 14 school board meeting,” said Marshall.

This resource was supported in whole or in part by funding provided by the State of California, administered by the California State Library via California Black Media as part of the Stop the Hate Program. The program is supported by partnership with California Department of Social Services and the California Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs as part of the Stop the Hate program. To report a hate incident or hate crime and get support, go to CA vs Hate.

Continue Reading

Bay Area

Mayor London Breed: State Awards San Francisco Over $37M for Affordable Housing

On April 30, Mayor London N. Breed announced San Francisco has been awarded more than $37.9 million in funding from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) as part of the State’s Multifamily Housing Program (MHP). The HCD loan will provide the final funding necessary for development of Casa Adelante – 1515 South Van Ness, a 168-unit affordable housing project located in San Francisco’s Mission District.

Published

on

San Francisco Mayor London N. Breed (File Photo)
San Francisco Mayor London N. Breed (File Photo)

By Oakland Post Staff

On April 30, Mayor London N. Breed announced San Francisco has been awarded more than $37.9 million in funding from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) as part of the State’s Multifamily Housing Program (MHP).

The HCD loan will provide the final funding necessary for development of Casa Adelante – 1515 South Van Ness, a 168-unit affordable housing project located in San Francisco’s Mission District.

The new development at 1515 South Van Ness Ave. will provide 168 affordable homes to low-income families, formerly homeless families, and persons living with HIV earning between 25-80% of the San Francisco Area Median Income (AMI).

In addition, the project is anticipated to provide family-friendly amenities and ground floor community-serving commercial spaces that preserve the prevailing neighborhood character of the Calle 24 Latino Cultural District.

“This funding unlocks our ability to move on building affordable housing units for families in San Francisco at a crucial time. We understand the level of need for more housing that is accessible, and like the state, the city continues to face a challenging budget cycle,” said Breed. “1515 South Van Ness is a good example of what can be achieved in San Francisco when you have strong community partnerships and an unwavering commitment to deliver on critical needs for our residents.”

“From the beginning of my term as Supervisor, I have fought to bring affordable housing to 1515 South Van Ness” said Supervisor Hillary Ronen.  “In the interim, the site has been utilized for homeless services and shelter, and I am thrilled that HCD has recognized the value of this development, and we are finally ready to break ground and bring 168 affordable homes to low income and formerly homeless families in the Mission.”

Owned and occupied by McMillan Electric Company until 2015, the City and County of San Francisco purchased 1515 South Van Ness Avenue in June 2019 with the intent of developing new affordable housing.

In November 2020, the San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) released a Multi-site Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeking qualified developers to build affordable housing on the site, and subsequently selected Chinatown Community Development Corporation (CCDC) and Mission Economic Development Agency (MEDA) in May 2021 to develop the site.

The project is expected to begin construction in winter 2025.

“A strong, long-term push by Mission advocates to make this site 100% affordable is now paying off, with 168 family units that include services and childcare. People of color communities know what they need, and we are excited to be in partnership with a team, consisting of MEDA, CCDC, and MOHCD, that listens,” said Malcolm Yeung, Executive Director at CCDC.

“We are excited to be in partnership with CCDC, yet again, and for the opportunity to develop intergenerational affordable housing in the City’s Mission District,” said Luis Granados, executive director at MEDA.

Increasing housing affordable to lower-income and vulnerable residents is a key priority in the City’s Housing Element which calls for additional funding for affordable housing production and preservation, as well as Mayor Breed’s Housing for All Executive Directive that sets out the steps the City will take to meet the bold goal of allowing for 82,000 new homes to be built over the next eight years.

Tuesday’s funding announcement emphasizes the importance of regional and state collaboration in order to reach our housing and climate goals.

“We are thrilled—not just to bring a project of this size to a community with great need — but to do so with community-based developers and their partners who understand the neighborhood and sensitivities around cultural preservation,” said HCD Director Gustavo Velasquez.

Continue Reading

City Government

Vallejo Continues to Accept Applications for Boards, Committees and Commissions

The City of Vallejo is requesting applications to serve on a number of the City’s boards and commissions. Vallejo residents who are interested in serving on an advisory body are invited to submit an application and supplemental questionnaire for consideration.

Published

on

Courtesy City of Vallejo.
Courtesy City of Vallejo.

By City of Vallejo

The City of Vallejo is requesting applications to serve on a number of the City’s boards and commissions. Vallejo residents who are interested in serving on an advisory body are invited to submit an application and supplemental questionnaire for consideration.

There are currently openings on the following boards, commissions, and committees:

For City Boards and Commissions, except for the Civil Service, McCune Collection, and Sister City Commissions, the Surveillance Advisory Board, and the Participatory Budgeting Steering Committee, all appointed members must complete and file a Statement of Economic Interests, Form 700, within 30 days of appointment.

All City Board and Commission members must complete AB 1234 Ethics training and file a Certificate of Completion within 30 days of appointment.

In most instances, to be eligible for appointment, applicants must be residents of the City of Vallejo. Information regarding the duties of each board and commission and specific criteria for appointment may be found within each application. With some exceptions, appointments are typically for a term of four years.

The application period will remain open until a sufficient number have been received in the City Clerk’s Office

Interviews with the City Council are tentatively scheduled for the evenings of June 3 and 10. Applicants must attend the interview to be considered for appointment on a board or commission.

Application forms and supplemental questionnaires are accessible in several ways:

By U.S. Mail: City of Vallejo, C/O City Clerk, PO Box 3068, Vallejo, CA 94590

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.