City Government
Oakland Community Backs Kaplan’s Renter Protection Proposal
The City Council is poised to place a renter protection measure on the November ballot, but housing advocates and community members are unsure what the measure will look like and if it is going to be significantly watered down by council members before going on the ballot.
There are currently three renter protection measures under discussion by City Councilmembers, one of which was reworked by Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan and has the support of the tenants’ rights activists, labor unions and the renter protection coalition who submitted the original version.
Her proposal will be voted to go onto the ballot in the July 19 City Council meeting.
“My proposal was written in collaboration with a wide coalition of community groups and experts, and has the support of a large number of people and community based groups, including SEIU Local 1021, ACCE, and many more,” said Kaplan.
Council President Lynette Gibson McElhaney has also drafted her own renter protection measure, which will come before the City Council on July 19.
Members of the Coalition to Protect Oakland Renters, which drafted the original ballot initiative, are pushing for Kaplan’s version of the measure since it incorporates their main concerns.
These include requiring landlords to petition to increase rents over the annual consumer price index;
Reducing the number of renters who lack the protections of Just Cause for Eviction;
Increasing the powers of the current Oakland rent board and the underfunded rent adjustment program;
And proposing solutions that are going to “stem the wave of displacement that is changing the face of Oakland’s historic, cultural and racial diversity,” according to organizers with the coalition.
Housing rights advocates are concerned that McElhaney’s version of the renter protection measure may be too weak to protect tenants at risk of displacement.
Little is currently known about McElhaney’s draft of the measure, and by press time, she had not responded to questions from the Post.
From public statements, it appears that parts of her version might be passed directly by the City Council while other parts would go to the November ballot.
According to Kaplan, one large difference between the two proposals is that “my proposal puts the improvements in place immediately, (McElhaney’s) proposal delays putting their proposal in place for a year or two, so it would not respond to the displacement crisis facing Oakland renters now.”
Items passed by ballot cannot be changed unless they are voted on by Oakland residents again. Items passed by the council can be changed at the council’s will.
Housing activists fear this will give the council too much power over the rent laws, especially since councilmembers are sometimes lobbied by outof-town developers who have an interest in increasing housing prices.
“The coalition is standing firm behind Rebecca (Kaplan’s) proposal,” said James Vann of the Post Salon Community Assembly.
“We also urge (Council) to continue the housing moratorium until sufficient policies are in place to protect tenants, who represent 60 percent of Oakland residents, from huge rent increases and increased evictions” said Vann.
(In an email to the Post, Council President McElhaney said that the Post mistakenly said that she authored a rent proposal. In her clarification, she wrote that the proposal in question is authored by Councilmember Dan Kalb, to which she has made significant amendments.
The Post has asked McElhaney to submit a column explaining what she is proposing for rent protection.)
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of June 7 – 13, 2023
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of June 7 – 13, 2023

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of May 31 – June 6, 2023
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of May 31 – June 6, 2023

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Activism
Community Opposes High Rise Development That Threatens Geoffrey’s Inner Circle
City Council chambers were full for the May 17 Planning Commission hearing, and almost all the 40 speakers who had signed up to make presentations talked about the importance of the Inner Circle as part of Oakland and Geoffrey Pete as a stalwart community and business leader who has served the city for decades.

By Ken Epstein
An outpouring of community supporters – young, old, jazz lovers, environmentalists and committed Oakland partisans – spoke out at a recent Planning Commission hearing to support Geoffrey Pete and his cultural center – The Inner Circle – an historic Oakland landmark whose future is threatened by a proposed skyscraper that out-of-town-developer Tidewater Capital wants to build in the midst of the city’s Black Arts Movement and Business District (BAMBD).
City Council chambers were full for the May 17 Planning Commission hearing, and almost all the 40 speakers who had signed up to make presentations talked about the importance of the Inner Circle as part of Oakland and Geoffrey Pete as a stalwart community and business leader who has served the city for decades.
The speakers argued passionately and persuasively, winning the sympathy of the commissioners, but were ultimately unsuccessful as the Commission unanimously approved the high-rise to be built either as a residential building or office tower on Franklin Street directly behind Geoffrey’s building.
Mr. Pete has said he would appeal the decision to the City Council. He has 10 days after the hearing to file an appeal on the office building. His appeal on the residential tower has already been submitted.
Mr. Pete said the Planning Department still has not published the boundaries of the BAMBD. “Tidewater’s applications and subsequent applications should not be approved until the Planning Department fully acknowledges the existence of the BAMBD,” he said.
“This (proposed) building poses a grave danger to the historic (Inner Circle) building next to it, arguably Oakland’s most meaningful historic building,” Pete said.
“We’re here to advocate for what’s best for the African American district and community that has gotten no representation, no advocacy, as of yet,” he said. “The (commission) is guilty, the City of Oakland is guilty, and Tidewater is guilty.”
One of the first speakers was Gwendolyn Traylor, known as Lady SunRise, who directly addressed the developers.
“With all due to respect to your business, it’s not a need of this community. I would like to ask you to reconsider the location …What is being (promised) here does not add to the healing of this community,” she said.
Naomi Schiff of the Oakland Heritage Alliance emphasized that Geoffrey’s Inner Circle is a treasure of Oakland’s history.
“Our first concern is the integrity of the historic district, in particular the former Athenian-Nile Club, now Mr. Pete’s equally historic venue, which has been the location of a great number of important community events,” she said. “It would not be OK with us if the integrity of the building were damaged in any way, no matter how much insurance (the developer bought) because it is very difficult to repair a historic building once it’s damaged.”
The Inner Circle was previously owned and operated by the Athenian-Nile Club, one of the Bay Area’s largest all-white-male exclusive private membership club, where politicians and power brokers closed back-room deals over handshakes and three martini lunches.
Cephus “Uncle Bobby X” Johnson pointed out that commissioners and the city’s Planning Department have “acknowledged that you went through the entire design review process without even knowing that the Black Arts Movement and Business District existed.”
The district was created in 2016 by City Council resolution. “At the heart of the opposition to this building is the desire to further the legacy of local Black entertainment and entrepreneurship exemplified by businesses like Mr. Pete’s … a historical landmark and venue (that serves) thousands of people who listen to jazz and other entertainment and hold weddings, receptions, and memorial services,” said Uncle Bobby.
This development is taking place within a context in which the “Black population in Oakland has decreased rapidly … because of the city’s concentration on building houses that are not affordable for people who currently live in Oakland,” he said.
John Dalrymple of East Bay Residents for Responsible Development said, “This project will result in significant air quality, public health, noise, and traffic impacts. He said the city has not adequately studied the (unmitigated) impacts of this project on the Black Arts Movement and Business District.
“This project is an example of what developers are being allowed to do when they don’t have to follow the law, and they don’t have to be sensitive to our city’s culture and values,” he said. The commission should “send a signal today that we will no longer be a feeding ground for the rich.”
Prominent Oakland businessman Ray Bobbitt told commissioners, “Any decision that you make is a contribution to the systemic process that creates a disproportionate impact on Black people. Please do yourself a favor, (and) rethink this scenario. Give Mr. Pete, who is a leader in our community, an opportunity to set the framework before you make any decision.”
Though the City Council created the BAMBD, the 2016 resolution was never implemented. The district was created to “highlight, celebrate, preserve and support the contributions of Oakland’s Black artists and business owners and the corridor as a place central historically and currently to Oakland’s Black artists and Black-owned businesses.”
The district was intended to promote Black arts, political movements, enterprises, and culture in the area, and to bring in resources through grants and other funding.
-
Activism1 day ago
Oakland Post: Week of June 7 – 13, 2023
-
Activism1 week ago
Oakland Post: Week of May 31 – June 6, 2023
-
Activism2 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of May 24 – 30, 2023
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of May 17 – 23, 2023
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of May 10 – 16, 2023
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Rise in Abductions of Black Girls in Oakland Alarms Sex-Trafficking Survivors
-
Activism3 weeks ago
The Case Against SB357: Black, Vulnerable and Trafficked
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Oakland Teachers Strike Continues Over Wages, ‘Common Good’ Demands for Needs of Parents, Students