Connect with us

News

Lawsuit Against Income-based Bail System Hits Roadblock

Published

on

A federal judge ruled this week against a class action lawsuit to overturn San Francisco’s bail bond system because –typical of bail systems throughout the country – it keeps people awaiting trial in jail simply because they do not have money.

 

While federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said the lawsuit’s concerns about the inequities of the bail bond system might have merit, decisions on bail are made by Superior Court judges, who are state officials. And states generally can’t be sued without the state consenting, which California has not granted in this case.

 

Judge Gonzalez, speaking at the court hearing Tuesday in Oakland, there is “no preliminary injunction this court can order. I understand the big picture, you may have something here, but you have not articulated it… There needs to be a legal avenue to get there.”

 

She gave the plaintiffs a month to submit another written motion.

 

The lawsuit is centered on Riana Buffin, 19, and Crystal Patterson, 29. Both were arrested in San Francisco for felony charges in October and were told by officials they could leave jail if they could post bail.

 

Buffin worked at the Oakland International Airport, supporting her family with her income. Because she was not able to afford 10 percent of $30,000, he stayed in jail and lost her job.

 

Patterson’s bond was set at $150,000. She went to a bail bond company, and with help from friends was able to gather $1,500 upfront and agreed to later pay $15,000 in full with interest.

 

Both cases were not pursued by the District Attorney, yet Patterson is still liable for $15,000 to the bail bond company. Had Patterson been able to afford the entire $150,000 upfront, she would have received her money back after all court appearances.

 

The lawsuit was filed by the organization Equal Justice Under the Law, which has also filed eight other cases like this throughout the US.

 

“We’re asking for an injunction against San Francisco for using cash bail,” said Phil Telfeyan, founder of the organization.

 

Cities in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Missouri, have reformed their bail laws due the lawsuits. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi has held the use of money bail violates the Equal Protection Clause.

 

“All of the nine lawsuits we’ve filed dealing with this bail issue are based on the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment. So it’s front and center in all of these lawsuits,” said Telfeyan.

 

The Constitution states: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

 

Telfeyan argues that holding people who cannot pay bail is unconstitutional, “San Francisco has a wealth based detention system. All arrestees are free to leave the jail as long as they can pay for it. It’s sort of pay for freedom scheme that obviously benefits the wealthy.”

 

If someone is charged with a federal crime, a federal judge will look at flight risk, and potential threat to the community to determine whether someone can be released. But on the state level, the decision is solely based on whether or not someone can afford bail, said Telfeyan.

 

Ross Mirkarimi, former Sheriff of San Francisco, endorsed the lawsuit. In an affidavit, he said, “I agree that the use of monetary conditions to detain pretrial defendants penalizes indigent arrestees solely based on their wealth status. The notion that someone’s freedom depends on the amount of money they have is anathema to equality and justice.”

 

According to Telfeyan, Mirkarimi estimates that it costs around $60,000 a year to incarcerate someone, while pretrial supervision only costs as little as two to three thousand dollars per year.

 

“Pretrial service agencies are able to get anywhere from 90 percent to virtually 100 percent of people to court by things like text messages, or a phone call. And these statistics are from people who never post bail,” said Telfeyan.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of April 24 – 30, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of April 24 – 30, 2024

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of April 17 – 23, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of April 17 – 23, 2024

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

California Black Media

Yahushua’s Law: Senate Advances Bill to Protect Students from Extreme Weather

In a significant move towards student safety, the California Senate Education Committee passed Senate Bill (SB) 1248, also known as Yahushua’s Law, on April 3. The bill is named in memory of Yahushua Robinson, a 12-year-old student from Lake Elsinore, who tragically died due to a heat-related illness during a physical education class in 2023. It is a pioneering effort to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Published

on

Yahushua Nyerere Robinson (Courtesy Photo)
Yahushua Nyerere Robinson (Courtesy Photo)

By California Black Media

In a significant move towards student safety, the California Senate Education Committee passed Senate Bill (SB) 1248, also known as Yahushua’s Law, on April 3.

The bill is named in memory of Yahushua Robinson, a 12-year-old student from Lake Elsinore, who tragically died due to a heat-related illness during a physical education class in 2023. It is a pioneering effort to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Authored by Senator Melissa Hurtado (D-Bakersfield) and co-authored by Assemblymember Akilah Weber, M.D. (D-La Mesa), SB 1248 directs the California Department of Education to develop comprehensive guidelines for schools regarding student activity during all extreme weather conditions.

“No student should ever lose their life on campus to extreme weather when we can take steps to protect them by preparing statewide plans to minimize exposure to the most harmful elements of exposure,” Hurtado said after introducing SB 1248.

The bill stipulates that schools must implement safety measures which include monitoring weather forecasts, postponing or relocating outdoor activities during hazardous conditions, and ensuring students have proper hydration and access to shade. It also requires schools to establish clear communication plans to keep parents, teachers, and students informed about potential weather hazards.

Supporters of the bill include the Robinson family, advocate Christina Laster, Bold Enterprises LLC, California Black Women’s Collective Empowerment Institute, Familias Empoderadas del Valle Central National Action Network, The Black Student Advocate, and the Ventura County Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority.

Thanking Hurtado for introducing this crucial legislation, Weber said, “The story of Yahushua Robinson last year was heartbreaking. We have protections for farm workers and other industries in the case of extreme weather, now climate change is forcing us to also extend similar protections to students at school.”

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.