Connect with us

Community

Glen Upshaw Wins “In the Name of Love” Humanitarian Award for Preventing Violence

Published

on

 

Glen Upshaw received the Humanitarian Award from Living Jazz, Inc. at its annual musical tribute to Martin Luther King Jr., “In the Name of Love,” last Sunday evening at the Scottish Rite Center in Oakland.

 

Coming of age in the 1960s was a trying time for young African American men whose taste of power made it hard to relinquish their dreams of equality and true democracy shortly thereafter in the ‘70s during the Reagan years with the war on Black people, disguised as a war on drugs.

 

Nonetheless, Upshaw did not let fear mitigate or guide his behavior. He finished high school and respected the lives of other Black men in the community, young and brash like himself, even when he disagreed.

 

It was a time, he recalls in a recent conversation, when Black life was precious, and elders showed by example that you do not criminalize an entire community based on the actions of one person.
“We’d talk to the person we had a problem with and tried to come to a peaceful agreement.” Upshaw said.

 

Fast forward 40 years, now an elder himself, Upshaw wears the badge of the streets. A peacemaker or violence interrupter for Youth Alive!, his job is to deescalate situations before they happen or restore peace and safety in situations where violence has taken place—often a death.

 

This involves a lot of negotiation and trust building between himself and his team and the perpetrators and victims. Resources are provided

Glen Upshaw.

Glen Upshaw

to all, such as trauma therapy and sanctuary for those needing to leave town.

 

 

The goal is safe streets.
Sound like war? Well it is one battle at a time. Victim and shooter often look like brothers or sisters, aunts or uncles. This is what make the work hard and emotionally trying for a violence interrupter working Oakland streets, Upshaw says.

 

A paycheck cannot put a value on services rendered while victims lie recovering at a Highland Hospital trauma unit or at home or elsewhere. Many times, Upshaw says he and his team show up and no one knows them, so why should they talk?

 

He is not a policeman. However, police will ask him to talk to a group of youth before they step in, to arrest them.

 

Upshaw says that being at home is something he does not take for granted, especially with a fourth strike. He says, “The judge told me that the next time I appear in his court to bring my pillow.”

 

This was 11 or 12 years ago. Upshaw has been walking the tightrope ever since. He sees his life as a warning to youth he sees hanging out smoking marijuana in front of elementary schools or kids not paying attention to whose car they ride – to think again.
Not only does Upshaw work as a violence Interrupter for Youth Alive!, he has established Men of Influence so that he can respond to principals who ask him to speak to boys hanging out near their school grounds.

 

With “Influence” he can also respond to the many children he meets under 12 years old who have run away. His organization also supports an adopt-a-family program during holiday seasons.

 

With such a busy schedule, Upshaw is the father of a 10-year-old angel, also mentors a youth. It is no wonder that Glen Upshaw he won this year’s Humanitarian Award.

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of January 15 – 21, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of January 15 – 21, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of January 8 – 14, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of January 8 – 14, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

#NNPA BlackPress

Supreme Court Decision Confirms Convicted Felon Will Assume Presidency

NNPA NEWSWIRE — In a 5-4 ruling, the court stated that Trump’s concerns could “be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal” and emphasized that the burden of sentencing was “relatively insubstantial” given that Trump will not face prison time. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s three liberal justices in the majority, with four conservative justices dissenting.

Published

on

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s emergency request to block criminal proceedings in his New York hush money case, ensuring that a sentencing hearing will proceed as scheduled on Friday. The decision makes it official that, on January 20, for the first time in its history, the United States will inaugurate a convicted felon as its president.

In a 5-4 ruling, the court stated that Trump’s concerns could “be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal” and emphasized that the burden of sentencing was “relatively insubstantial” given that Trump will not face prison time. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s three liberal justices in the majority, with four conservative justices dissenting.

Trump was convicted in May for falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg argued that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to intervene in a state criminal case, particularly before all appeals in state courts were exhausted.

Trump’s legal team claimed the sentencing process would interfere with his transition to power and argued that evidence introduced during the trial included official actions protected under the Supreme Court’s prior ruling granting former presidents immunity for official conduct. Merchan, the New York judge who presided over the trial, ruled in December that the evidence presented was unrelated to Trump’s duties as president.

Prosecutors dismissed Trump’s objections, stating that the sentencing would take less than an hour and could be attended virtually. They said the public interest in proceeding to sentencing outweighed the President-elect’s claims of undue burden.

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the four dissenting justices, confirmed speaking to Trump by phone on Wednesday. Alito insisted the conversation did not involve the case, though the call drew criticism given his previous refusals to recuse himself from politically sensitive matters.

The sentencing hearing is set for Friday at 9:30 a.m. in Manhattan. As the nation moves closer to an unprecedented inauguration, questions about the implications of a convicted felon assuming the presidency remain.

“No one is above the law,” Bragg said.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.