#NNPA BlackPress

COMMENTARY: America Has yet to Become Great — For All of Its People!

THE DALLAS WEEKLY — As America approaches its 250th anniversary, a critical question emerges regarding its foundational promise of equality. While fireworks light up celebratory skies, a deeper examination asks when the nation was truly “great” for all its inhabitants.
The post COMMENTARY: America Has yet to Become Great — For All of Its People! appeared first on BlackPressUSA.

Published

1 month ago

July 7, 2026

Oakland Post

Two hundred and fifty years.

That is how long America has been chasing its own promise.

As fireworks illuminated on “The 4th – 250,” the night sky and politicians wrap themselves in the language of patriotism, millions of Americans celebrated the birth of a nation founded on the breathtaking declaration that “all men are created equal.”

It is one of the most beautiful ideas ever written.

It is also one of the least consistently practiced – in America and across the World.

So, as America celebrates its 250th birthday, I offer a question that deserves more than a slogan.

When, exactly, was America “great” — for everyone?

Not for those who owned land while others were owned.

Not for those whose rights were guaranteed while others had to fight, bleed, march, and die just to be recognized as fully human.

Not for those whose freedom was protected while others were told to wait.

If the answer is that we must “Make America Great Again,” then history deserves a simple response.

Great Again…when?

Was America great for the Indigenous nations driven from ancestral lands through warfare, violence, forced removal, and treaties our government repeatedly broke?

Was America great for the millions of Africans stolen from their homeland, sold as property, mutilated and beaten into submission, denied literacy, denied family, denied freedom — and then expected to build the wealth of the very nation that denied their humanity?

Was America great for [Kidnapped Africans] Black Americans who endured another century of lynching, segregation, voter suppression, redlining, unequal schools, mass incarceration, being murdered by law enforcement, and the persistent reality that equality under law has too often depended upon assimilation, ZIP code, skin color, or political convenience?

Was America great for women who were taxed without representation, denied the ballot, denied equal opportunity, and expected to remain silent in a democracy built upon the right to speak?

Was America great for Chinese laborers who built the railroads but were rewarded with exclusion? For Japanese Americans imprisoned without trial because of their ancestry? For Irish, Italians, Jews, Mexicans, Muslims, Sikhs, and countless immigrants who were repeatedly told they were not “real Americans,” and pitted against those in the Black American communities?

Was America great for LGBTQ Americans who spent generations hiding who they were — not because they lacked dignity, but because society refused to recognize it and did not acknowledge the violence being brought against them?

Was it great for veterans who returned from foreign battlefields only to discover that surviving war was easier than surviving peace on American streets?

Or is it great today for the countless number of homeless American veterans sleeping beneath an overpass while politicians – who have NEVER served – deliver baseless speeches about patriotism?

For the family working two full-time jobs and still choosing between rent, groceries, or childcare?

For children whose educational opportunities depend more on their neighborhood than their potential?

For communities where healthcare, clean water, economic investment, and equal justice remain aspirations instead of guarantees – even now in 2026?

Ask them.

Then ask yourself.

Because history is not merely what happened.

History is what we choose to remember, what we choose to honestly document.

And what we choose to ignore.

America has accomplished extraordinary things.

We have expanded human knowledge – greatly.

Defeated tyranny abroad – and here at home in America.

Walked on the moon.

Invented technologies that transformed civilization.

Inspired democratic movements around the world.

These achievements deserve admiration.

But achievement is not the same as justice.

Innovation is not equality.

Military strength is not moral greatness.

GDP is not human dignity.

The mythology of American exceptionalism often asks us to celebrate the destination while ignoring the millions of people who were denied a seat on the journey.

Real patriotism refuses that bargain.

Real patriotism tells the truth — even when the truth is uncomfortable.

Especially when it is uncomfortable.

Every chapter of progress in American history has come because ordinary people challenged extraordinary injustice.

The abolitionists challenged slavery.

The suffragists challenged patriarchy.

Labor organizers challenged exploitation.

Civil Rights activists challenged segregation and human indifference.

Disability-rights advocates challenged exclusion.

LGBTQ Americans challenged criminalization and invisibility.

None of those movements were popular when they began.

Each was condemned.

Each was told to “wait.”

Each was accused of dividing America.

History eventually has revealed something else.

They were not dividing America.

They were asking America to become America.

That is the unfinished story of this nation.

Not perfection. Progress.

Not mythology. Truth.

Not comfort. Conscience.

As an American, a veteran, and a citizen who has experienced discrimination firsthand, I have learned that honest conversation is not something to fear.

It is democracy’s lifeblood.

It exposes what slogans and staged distractions conceal.

It challenges what privilege often refuses to acknowledge.

It reminds us that loving one’s country does not require believing it has never failed.

In fact, love without honesty is not love at all.

It is public relations.

This “Freedom of Speech” is not an indictment of America.

It is an invitation.

An invitation to see.

To listen.

To question.

To imagine an America where opportunity is not inherited but shared.

Where liberty belongs not to the fortunate, but to everyone.

Where justice is not selective but universal – For All.

Because patriotism without accountability becomes mythology.

History without truth becomes propaganda.

And democracy without honest dialogue eventually becomes performance.

As America marks its 250th birthday, perhaps the question is no longer whether America was ever great.

Perhaps the better question is this:

Will America finally become what it has always promised to be?

Not for some.

Not for the powerful.

Not for those history has always favored.

But for everyone.

That will be the day America becomes truly exceptional.

When it does not just talk about Godly principles, but exemplify the true Spirit of God.

Not because we said it.

Because we finally lived it.

Until then, America’s greatest achievement is not behind us.

It is still waiting to be built.

The bricks are already in our hands.

The only question left is this:

Where will you place your brick, Patriot?

The post America Has Yet to Become Great—For All of Its People! appeared first on Dallas Weekly.

Based on reporting by The Dallas Weekly.

The post COMMENTARY: America Has yet to Become Great — For All of Its People! appeared first on BlackPressUSA.

Oakland Post

Posts by Oakland Post

Up Next

Don’t Let Fraud and Scams Ground Your Summer Vacation

Don't Miss

COMMENTARY: A Metro Car Photo Became a Portrait of Trump’s America

Oakland Post

Click to comment

#NNPA BlackPress

COMMENTARY: Jim Crow 2.0 at the Pentagon

BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — The American people are expected to believe that one extraordinary officer after another suddenly fails to meet some undefined standard of excellence. We are expected to ignore impeccable service records while accepting that political appointees alone possess the wisdom to determine who is worthy of advancement.

Published

2 weeks ago

August 3, 2026

bpusa-syndication

Pete Hegseth insists that he is restoring “merit” to the United States military. But after months of dismissals, blocked promotions, and ideological purges, the evidence tells a different story. His campaign against so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion” has become something far more dangerous: an assault on equal opportunity that falls with particular force on African Americans, while also targeting women, Latinos, gay Americans, and transgender service members.

The latest example is both troubling and infuriating.

Once again, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reportedly blocked the promotion of an exceptionally qualified woman—Rear Admiral Amy Bauernschmidt. Bauernschmidt is no ordinary officer. She became the Navy’s first woman to command a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, one of the most demanding leadership assignments in the world. Her career reflects decades of exemplary performance, operational excellence, and leadership under extraordinary pressure.

Yet once again, a distinguished military career appears to have been subordinated to an ideological agenda masquerading as “merit.”

I call BS!

The American people are expected to believe that one extraordinary officer after another suddenly fails to meet some undefined standard of excellence. We are expected to ignore impeccable service records while accepting that political appointees alone possess the wisdom to determine who is worthy of advancement.

The pattern has become impossible to ignore.

General Charles Q. Brown Jr., only the second African American to serve as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was dismissed despite a career that placed him among the most accomplished military leaders of his generation.

Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman ever to serve as Chief of Naval Operations, was removed despite decades of distinguished command experience.

Reports have documented interventions that blocked or delayed the promotions of Black officers and women selected through the military’s rigorous promotion system.

Now Rear Admiral Amy Bauernschmidt joins the growing list of highly accomplished officers whose careers have been derailed for reasons that have never been persuasively explained.

Where is Congress?

Its silence has become deafening.

Congress has an independent constitutional responsibility to oversee the armed forces. Instead, too many lawmakers have watched silently while one of the nation’s most respected institutions is subjected to ideological litmus tests and political interference.

This is not military reform. It is testosterone-fueled performative masculinity disguised as a philosophy of military excellence.

The irony is impossible to miss. Hegseth repeatedly invokes “merit,” yet his rhetoric begins with the assumption that Black officers, women, and other historically excluded Americans must somehow justify their achievements in ways that white male officers are rarely required to do.

That is not meritocracy. It is prejudice wrapped in patriotic language.

No one is asking that anyone be promoted because of race or gender. Americans simply expect that promotions be based on demonstrated competence, leadership, integrity, and service. The officers being targeted have already proven themselves repeatedly under one of the world’s most demanding evaluation systems.

Their records speak for themselves.

The attack on African American military leadership has been especially pernicious.

For generations, Black Americans fought in segregated units, earned decorations while denied equal treatment, and repeatedly demonstrated loyalty to a nation that often failed to extend them full citizenship. They broke barriers not because standards were lowered but because excellence finally overcame institutional discrimination.

Today’s campaign against “diversity” threatens to revive old assumptions under new slogans.

The implication that Black generals and admirals somehow owe their success to affirmative action rather than extraordinary performance echoes some of the ugliest stereotypes of the Jim Crow era. Yesterday’s segregationists claimed Black Americans were inherently less qualified. Today’s culture warriors simply employ more politically acceptable language while inviting the same suspicion about Black achievement.

That is why Hegseth’s campaign increasingly resembles Jim Crow 2.0.

The targets may now wear stars on their shoulders instead of military patches on segregated uniforms, but the underlying message is hauntingly familiar: Black excellence is presumed suspect, while white excellence is presumed earned.

America’s military became the finest fighting force in history because it opened its doors to talent wherever it could be found. It grew stronger after President Truman desegregated the armed forces. It became stronger when women assumed greater command responsibilities. It became stronger when every qualified American was given the opportunity to serve to the fullest extent of their abilities.

Diversity is not a concession. It is a strategic advantage.

The nation’s adversaries do not fear an American military because it is racially homogeneous. They fear it because it draws upon the talents of more than 340 million Americans whose diverse experiences, perspectives, and abilities make our armed forces unmatched anywhere in the world.

Every politically motivated dismissal of a distinguished officer sends a chilling message throughout the ranks: excellence alone may no longer be enough if you belong to the wrong demographic group.

That weakens morale. It weakens recruitment. It weakens retention.

And ultimately, it weakens national security.

Pete Hegseth has every right to pursue military readiness. He has no right to redefine merit in ways that repeatedly cast suspicion upon the accomplishments of Black officers, women, and others who have devoted their lives to defending this nation.

America deserves better. The men and women who wear the uniform deserve better. The Constitution deserves better.

And unless Congress finds the courage to exercise meaningful oversight, history may well remember this period not as a restoration of military excellence, but as the moment political ideology attempted to resurrect, in modern form, the old poison of exclusion.

Jim Crow did not strengthen America. Jim Crow 2.0 will not strengthen America’s military. It will only diminish it

Wade Henderson
Strategic Advisor
Civil and Human Rights
wade@wadejhenderson.com

bpusa-syndication

Posts by bpusa-syndication

#NNPA BlackPress

New Judge Could Decide if Karmelo Anthony Gets a New Trial

By Emilie St. John (Contributor) Karmelo Anthony will return to court next month in his first step to overturn his murder conviction. Anthony was found guilty last month in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf and sentenced to 35 years in prison. His new legal team has filed motions seeking the recusal of State District […]
The post New Judge Could Decide if Karmelo Anthony Gets a New Trial appeared first on BlackPressUSA.

Published

2 weeks ago

July 31, 2026

Oakland Post

By Emilie St. John
(Contributor)

Karmelo Anthony will return to court next month in his first step to overturn his murder conviction.

Anthony was found guilty last month in the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf and sentenced to 35 years in prison. His new legal team has filed motions seeking the recusal of State District Judge John Roach Jr. from overseeing the appeals process.

Two hearings have been scheduled on the motion for Aug. 9 and 10 in the Collin County Courthouse in McKinney, Texas, according to Fox4 News.

On July 14, Senior Judge Sid L. Harle of the 226th District Court was assigned to preside over the defense’s motion to recuse Collin County Judge John Roach. The assignment took effect immediately and authorized Harle to handle all matters related to the recusal request, the filing read.

The Collin County District Attorney’s Office continues to defend its handling of the case by issuing a statement to NBC 5 DFW.

“The defendant’s new lawyers have filed a motion containing several inaccurate characterizations of the trial proceedings. The entire prosecution team and I conducted this trial ethically and in full compliance with the Court’s rulings and any agreements with defense counsel. We look forward to addressing these claims thoroughly in a Court of law in the coming weeks. The jury heard extensive evidence over the course of the trial and returned a unanimous verdict. We remain confident in that verdict and the fairness of the proceedings.”

Anthony’s new legal team, made up of appellate, civil rights, and criminal defense attorneys, was retained following Anthony’s conviction.

“Our responsibility is to determine whether a legal error occurred and to ensure that every issue supported by the record is fully and vigorously presented on appeal,” the team said in a statement.

“We recognize the profound loss suffered by one young man’s family and the uncertainty facing another, and we extend our respect to everyone whose lives have been forever changed by these events,” the release reads.

Anthony was charged with the stabbing death of Austin Metcalf during a track meet in Frisco, Texas, April 2, 2025. Anthony has long maintained it was an act of self-defense.

The attorneys are representing Anthony pro bono. The nearly 200-page notice of appeal seeks a new trial because his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was violated.

“The cumulative and practical effect of these provisions was to exclude members of the public from proceedings at every stage,” the filing reads.

The filing also focused on an alleged “handshake deal” that kept Anthony from taking the stand in his defense.

The defense filing said the agreement was that the jury would not hear that Metcalf and his twin brother had been accused of racism and bullying in the past. In exchange, they also would not see Anthony’s cellphone records or his school disciplinary record, according to court documents reported by the Dallas Morning News.

Anthony’s former defense attorney, Mike Howard, said the defense relied heavily on that deal. The team chose not to ask certain questions of witnesses or call on a separate expert witness based on that agreement. It also abandoned plans to introduce testimony and evidence about the allegations against Metcalf and his brother.

Appellate attorney Russell Wilson is now handling post-trial proceedings and Anthony’s appeal. He recently sat down for an interview, stating, “The court committed multiple errors during the June murder trial, preventing him from receiving a fair trial.”

“You know, we file motions that we expect to prevail on, but we understand that there’s two sides to every story. And at the end of the day, it’ll be a judge that has to make these decisions, but we feel confident in the positions that we’re taking,” Wilson said during an interview with WFAA. “There were substantial issues that we thought a reviewing court needed to look at. We thought these were constitutional irregularities, and we could have them addressed now. And so, we put them into a motion for a new trial.”

Bree West, a former Dallas County Assistant District Attorney, found it startling that so little time was given to Anthony’s team for such a serious “life or death” situation.

“I do think that it’s really challenging that potentially a court decided that you have 10 minutes to make that level of decision when it has the potential of being life-altering,” said West during an interview with Fox 4 News.

Judge Harle is no stranger to high-profile cases, having presided over the prosecution of a police officer charged in connection with the 2022 mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde.

Anthony was convicted on June 9 of the murder of Austin Metcalf and sentenced to 35 years in prison.

The post New Judge Could Decide if Karmelo Anthony Gets a New Trial appeared first on BlackPressUSA.

Oakland Post

Posts by Oakland Post

#NNPA BlackPress

COMMENTARY: LSMFT! Lord Save Me from Trump!

WESTSIDE GAZETTE — The author criticizes Donald Trump’s rhetoric, noting his use of terms like “Dumbocrats” and “Communist” to describe Democrats and democracy. The column asserts that Trump’s current strategy involves creating doubt about midterm elections due to a lack of Republican agenda.
The post COMMENTARY: LSMFT! Lord Save Me from Trump! appeared first on BlackPressUSA.

Published

2 weeks ago

July 31, 2026

Oakland Post

Frankly Speaking

Wow! Wow! Wow! The swamp drainers have truly stepped down to new levels of stupidity. You remember Weapons of Mass Destruction? We now have Weapons of Mass Distraction. Trump has introduced Dumbocrats and Communists into the conversation about Democrats and Democracy.

Trump lies so much, and his current strategy is to set up doubt about midterm elections because he and Republicans have no agenda!

He has no “Trump “ card, but Iran has a strait! He called it a skirmish; it’s now a War. He said five days; now it’s five months. He said few casualties; now it’s 18 deaths. He knew nothing about Project 2025 but hired its architects! Trump lies about the lies and often forgets these little inventions called cameras and phones

We see and hear and then see and hear the inconsistencies.

I didn’t like 45 and dislike 47 even more!

The post LSMFT! Lord Save Me From Trump! appeared first on The Westside Gazette.

Based on reporting by Westside Gazette.

The post COMMENTARY: LSMFT! Lord Save Me from Trump! appeared first on BlackPressUSA.