Business

Cloud Solutions Can Help Overhaul Enterprise Protection Against Evolving Threats

BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — Outdated enterprise security is a breach waiting to happen. Learn here how quality cloud solutions can help protect your firm against evolving digital threats.

Published

3 months ago

July 18, 2026

Post News Group

Cloud solutions can help overhaul enterprise protection against evolving threats

Cloud solutions can help enhance enterprise protection from new threats by shifting away from perimeter-based defenses and moving toward dynamic, cloud-native frameworks. With the latter, organizations can enjoy AI-driven threat detection, centralized visibility, and automated remediation.

Today’s firms must be more cautious than ever with security, given the many threats against information technology (IT).

Cybersecurity news platform HackRead.com cited data from the 19th (2026) Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR), stating that Verizon security experts analyzed over 22,000 confirmed data breaches. They also investigated 31,000 real-world security incidents across 145 countries.

What Do “Cloud Solutions” Mean?

The term “cloud solutions” refers to cloud data storage, computing services, and software programs hosted on remote internet servers instead of physical, local hard drives or on-site data centers.

Thanks to cloud solutions, today’s users can now access the applications and data they need from any device connected to the internet. They no longer have to rely on expensive hardware or deal with costly equipment maintenance fees.

What Are Examples of Cloud Solutions?

Cloud solutions make up a multi-billion-dollar market. According to Mordor Intelligence, the estimated value of the U.S. cloud computing market alone was $292.61 billion in 2026, and it is expected to grow to $622.03 billion by 2031.

Some of the most common examples of such cloud solutions include the following.

Software as a Service (SaaS)

Software as a Service programs are ready-to-use software applications that users access via web browsers. Google Workspace (for collaboration purposes) and Zoom (for video conferencing) are specific examples of SaaS.

Platform as a Service (PaaS)

The term “Platform as a Service” refers to cloud computing models that enable developers to create, build, develop, deploy, and manage applications without having to deal with and worry about the actual underlying infrastructure. With these solutions, developers can access resources like:

Virtual servers
Cloud storage services
Operating systems
Databases
Development tools
Runtime environments

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)

Infrastructure as a Service, another type of cloud computing model, gives service providers a way and place to host and manage fundamental IT infrastructure. Hosts or managers can provide customers with various products and services over the internet, including:

Servers
Storage
Networking hardware

With an IaaS provider, customers can rent virtualized resources on demand, paying only for what they use. They can also easily scale their required resources up or down, depending on how much they need within a given time period.

How Can Cloud Solutions Overhaul Enterprise Protection Against New Threats?

A March 2026 article from Time Magazine noted that the global average approximate cost of just one data breach is $4.44 million. It also reported that between March 2024 and February 2025, cyberattacks that targeted U.S. companies cost over $10 million.

With so much money and potential losses on the line, organizations should consider overhauling their enterprise protection, particularly against emerging threats, with the help of cloud solutions. Such innovations can assist through the following features.

AI-Driven Threat Detection

Some of today’s most reliable cloud solutions (including those that are part of managed services) offer AI-driven threat detection features. They use advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to identify established, new, and suspected cybersecurity risks in real time.

AI-driven threat detectors can even respond to threats through automated flagging of dangerous anomalies. They can help prevent users from pushing through with activities that could lead to exploits breaching the network.

Centralized Visibility

Another way cloud solutions can help overhaul enterprise security is by breaking down fragmented security silos. They then transform these segments into a unified management plane.

With cloud solutions, organizations can consolidate various types of data, including:

Audit logs
User identities
Network flows

Through consolidation, these datasets’ visibility and overall management become more centralized and straightforward.

Automated Remediation

Organizations that prioritize data security and protection will be happy to know that automatic backup, disaster recovery, and security hardening are part of the cloud solutions that a reliable hybrid cloud managed services provider delivers.

It pays to have automated backup and disaster recovery, as it can help minimize or even eliminate costly downtime. It can also help prevent catastrophic data loss in the event of ransomware or, in the case of hybrid setups, hardware failure.

With automated remediation services, organizations can spare valuable IT resources from tedious, labor-intensive manual processes. Instead of spending time on these tasks, IT specialists can focus on higher-value initiatives, such as proactive threat hunting and elimination.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Exactly Do Managed Services Mean?

The term “managed services” refers to a business model in which an organization outsources the daily management, support, and maintenance of its core business functions. They outsource these services to an external third party, also known as a “managed service provider” (MSP).

Managed services primarily cater to IT and technology operations. There are many types of managed IT services, with the most common being cloud solutions, enterprise security (e.g., cybersecurity management and remote monitoring), and help desk support.

How Else Can Businesses Protect Themselves From Cyber Threats?

Aside from investing in high-quality, protective cloud solutions, businesses should also enforce zero-trust access.

Zero-trust access can help protect sensitive data by implementing a “never trust, always verify” protocol at every connection point. It involves ensuring that continuous authentication will always be mandatory. Security teams must always evaluate each access request.

Mandating multi-factor authentication (MFA) is another way for businesses to protect themselves from cyber threats. MFA can help neutralize credential-based attacks and breaches by requiring extra verification factors.

In addition to a username and password, for instance, MFA may require a PIN code. More innovative systems may even mandate a biometric feature, such as a fingerprint or facial/retinal scan.

Training all employees, both new and tenured, is another way to combat cyber threats. Through ongoing education, everyone can become more knowledgeable in recognizing, resisting, and reporting threats. They’ll be more adept at identifying and avoiding phishing, social engineering, or deepfakes.

Protect Enterprise Security With Robust Cloud Solutions

Cloud solutions, with their AI-driven threat-detecting capabilities, centralized visibility, and automated remediation response, can help overhaul and protect enterprise security. Combined with other practical, proactive measures, such as zero-trust access, MFA, and training, firms can significantly minimize their risk of falling victim to cybercrimes.

Find even more related, informative guides like this or the latest news impacting the Black community by browsing the rest of our platform.

Post News Group

Posts by Post News Group

Up Next

Aftermarket Auto Parts Breathe New Life into Older Cars

Don't Miss

What Are the Top 3 Chronic Diseases in the US?

Post News Group

Click to comment

Business

Trader Vic’s Returns to Its Oakland Roots

Trader Vic’s, the internationally recognized brand and birthplace of the original Mai Tai, has officially returned to its roots in Oakland. Originally founded in 1934 on San Pablo Avenue before moving to Emeryville, the hospitality giant has launched Trader Vic’s Outpost at Oakland International Airport’s Terminal 2. The new full-service location offers travelers breakfast, lunch, dinner, and cocktails in a 108-seat space designed to celebrate the city’s status as a top national food destination. Visit the website to read more.

Published

4 days ago

October 19, 2026

Post News Group

Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee cuts the ribbon at the official opening of Trader Vic’s Outpost and Plum Market at Oakland International Airport. She is assisted by U.S. Rep. Lateefah Simon as Port of Oakland Board President Stephanie Dominguez Walton, left, and representatives from Trader Vic's, Plum Market, look on. Photo courtesy of the mayor’s office.

By Special to The Post

Oakland has always been a city of innovators, entrepreneurs, visionaries, and world-class hospitality. Trader Vic’s—the birthplace of the original Mai Tai – first opened in Oakland back in 1934 on San Pablo Avenue, long before becoming an internationally recognized global brand.

More than 50 years after it moved to Emeryville, Trader Vic’s is returning to its roots. Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee touts the return as another victory for Oakland.

“My administration is deeply committed to backing businesses like Trader Vic’s and Plum Market—partners who invest in our city, uplift our local workforce, and support thousands of local jobs,” Lee said.

The latest Trader Vic’s – called Trader Vic’s Outpost – is located at the Oakland International Airport in Terminal 2 near Gate 25 and had a soft opening in August.

With 108 dining seats, 28 bar seats and a counter for standing-room customers, travelers from around the world can have a full-service restaurant and bar experience or take-out for those with planes to catch.

Open from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., breakfast, lunch, dinner, cocktails will be served.

Trader Vic’s returning to its roots confirms Condé Nast’s decision to name Oakland the #1 Food City in America two years in a row, and just earlier this month, ranked Oakland #6 on their list of Best Cities in the U.S.!

“The opening at OAK is incredibly meaningful for us,” said Rhett Rosen, CEO of Trader Vic’s Hospitality Group, according to the company website. “Trader Vic’s was born in the Bay Area, and this new location gives us the chance to welcome travelers with a taste of that original spirit before they take off. It brings together everything people love about Trader Vic’s — great cocktails, flavorful food, warm hospitality and a little sense of escape — in a place that connects Oakland to the world.”

Trader Vic’s is an Oakland institution and one of the region’s most recognizable hospitality brands, said Port of Oakland Director of Aviation Craig Simon on the web site.

“Travelers are increasingly seeking dining options that are memorable, locally rooted, and uniquely representative of the communities they are visiting. Trader Vic’s delivers all of that while providing a high-quality food and beverage experience for our guests. We are proud to welcome this hometown favorite to Terminal 2,”

The original Trader Vic’s in Oakland:

In 1934, with an investment of $500, Bergeron opened his initially small restaurant at 65th Avenue and San Pablo, serving comfort foods for lunch and dinner and beers and whiskeys. As his clientele grew, so did his restaurant, expanding space and menu options. After visiting this establishment, famed San Francisco Chronicle columnist Herb Caen proclaimed that the “best restaurant in San Francisco is in Oakland.”

There were as many as 25 franchises worldwide, including the U.S. Trader Vic’s is now headquartered in Martinez.

Post News Group

Posts by Post News Group

Business

Oakland Coal Terminal Backed by Trump Would Be Bigger, Dirtier Than Promised, Says Report

A recent feasibility study commissioned by potential investors says an Oakland coal terminal backed by President Donald Trump could export 13 million tons a year — three times the amount estimated in an earlier environmental review. Surprisingly, the report also contradicts devel

Published

4 days ago

October 19, 2026

Post News Group

East Bay residents have been fighting alongside No Coal in Oakland for more than a decade. Photo courtesy of No Coal in Oakland.

By Post Staff

Surprisingly, the report also contradicts developers’ and project advocates’ repeated pledges that the coal would be stored in a covered terminal. Instead, the millions of tons of coal shipped annually from inland states to the West Gateway terminal in Oakland would be stored in “two open-air bunkers,” with about 150,000 tons of coal per stockpile, before being sent overseas, according to the recent report cited by the L.A. Times. (https://ruic.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Port-Study-RUIC-Bulk-Commodity-Ocean-Terminals-Study.pdf)

Residents and clean air advocates have long expressed concerns that coal dust would worsen pollution in West Oakland and throughout the East Bay.

The proposed site of the Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal (OBOT) is located at the former Army base near the Port of Oakland, which developer Phil Tagami has been trying for years to turn into a shipping terminal despite determined community opposition.

Trump announced a $75-million investment in the project in June, about a third of its estimated cost. The new terminal would be the largest coal export site on the West Coast, transporting coal to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and Malaysia, according to the Trump administration.

Opponents say a new terminal would undermine years of progress cleaning up the air in West Oakland, which has a history of disproportionate pollution and high asthma rates due to its proximity to the port and other industry.

According to No Coal in Oakland organizer Ted Franklin, who has been active for 11 years in the fight to stop the coal terminal, the report indicates that investors may be looking for a cheaper way to build the terminal.

“We were shocked but not surprised” by the report, Franklin said. “Basically, it seems that the plan now is to store open piles of coal, which is a less expensive project than creating a completely enclosed facility.”

The threats that the project poses are real, but it faces a lot of economic and legal hurdles, he said.

Coal production is in permanent decline worldwide, he said, wondering who was going to “invest money in an industry that has no future.”

Further, the project has not yet attracted big investors. “There’s no bank, no financing, no financial institution backing this,” he continued.

A major legal hurdle facing the project is the passage of Assemblymember Mia Bonta’s bill, AB 40, the Community-First Coal Review Act, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sept. 30.

The law requires developers of large-volume bulk coal facilities to complete a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) before they can operate.

The law was specifically designed to block or delay the coal terminal project.

The report to potential developers was produced by consulting groups Norda Stelo and Wood Mackenzie in July and released this month. It was commissioned by the Rural Utah Infrastructure Coalition, made up of eight Utah counties that are considering investing about $43 million into the terminal to receive Utah coal.

The consultants produced their findings after visiting Oakland, examining engineering documents and holding discussions with Savage Cos., a Utah-based transport and logistics company selected to operate the facility

Research has shown that coal terminal operations can be dangerous to public health. The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach moved away from open-air coal and petroleum coke storage three decades ago.

The report says that the site could process 12 million metric tons, or 13.2 million tons, of coal each year, three times more than the terminal’s approved environmental impact report from 2002 and its 2012 addendum. Neither document mentions coal specifically, but rather bulk commodities.

The coal arriving in Oakland could also be dirtier then had been previously stated, according to the report. Project officials previously said the terminal would handle only high-grade western bituminous coal from Utah, but the recent report says it will also handle Powder River Basin coal from Wyoming and Montana, known to be much dustier.

Nor does the report mention plans to cover the rail cars to prevent pollution, though project officials previously promised they would only utilize coal transported in covered rail cars.

“It appears the developers want to build something much bigger and more polluting than anything they previously revealed, either in court or to the West Oakland community,” said Colin O’Brien, deputy managing attorney at the nonprofit Earthjustice, speaking to the L.A. Times.

The report indicates that the project may be much more expensive and take longer to complete than anticipated. The Energy Department estimates the terminal will cost about $231 million, but the report places the price at between $430 million and $625 million.

The terminal will take 53 months to complete according to the report, significantly longer than Trump’s promise of exports beginning in 2028.

Ted Franklin’s column, “Utah Study Blesses Investment in Oakland Coal Terminal but Leaves Key Questions Unanswered” is available at https://nocoalinoakland.info/utah-study-blesses-investment-in-oakland/