Connect with us

Activism

Port Workers and West Oakland Residents Oppose A’s New Ballpark

Published

on

Over 100 community members attended a discussion held by leaders of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 10 on Sept. 21, to oppose the Oakland Athletics’ plans to build a new ballpark at Howard Terminal.

“This is not about baseball, this is about gobbling up land, this is a real estate investment,” said event organizer and former ILWU Local 10 Secretary-Treasurer Derrick Muhammad as he addressed the crowd gathered at the West Oakland Senior Center.

The A’s proposal to build a stadium at Howard Terminal on the Port of Oakland includes the construction of 3,000 condominiums, a 400 room hotel, and a multi-million dollar gondola to transport fans to and from the park.

ILWU leaders and West Oakland community members expressed concerns about the implications of a ballpark on the city’s industrial waterfront.

Over 100 community members and port workers gathered at the West Oakland Senior Center to oppose the A’s plans for a new ballpark at Howard Terminal.

“We believe that once you start placing houses adjacent to industry, you subject that industry to complaints of the neighbors,” said Muhammad, who fears that in the long run Oakland could suffer the same fate as Detroit, which some have called a “ghost town” in reference to large swaths of the city that were abandoned after the decline of the automotive industry between 2008 and 2010.

The A’s plan to flank their new ballpark with 3,000 apartments, in the middle of Oakland’s industrial hub where air pollution is some of the highest in the Bay Area. A few hundred yards adjacent to Howard Terminal, recycling plant Schnitzer Steel grinds up and recycles on average over 500,000 metric tons of cars, household appliances and scrap metals per year, according to their 2017-2018 Sustainability Report. While the company has significantly reduced emissions in recent years, during the day acrid smells waft from the plant on to the Howard Terminal lot.

Meanwhile, the A’s are promoting their project as an environmental solution. A Feb. 15  report by the San Francisco Chronicle found that decades of industrial activity had contaminated the soil and groundwater at Howard Terminal with “hazardous” and “cancer-causing chemicals,” that would require removal prior to construction.

On their website, the A’s pledge to “fully remediate these environmental issues at no cost to taxpayers,” along with the rest of the project that they promise will be “100 percent privately financed by the Oakland A’s.”

This statement comes in contrast to a California bill in the works, SB 293, which would potentially allocate millions in public tax money to cover costs for anything from transportation and waste management, to the “remediation of hazardous materials,” on the Howard Terminal property.

If signed by Gov. Newsom, SB 293 will fund the infrastructure needed for the ballpark by creating a new Oakland tax district and will cover any costs related to making the Howard Terminal site buildable and accessible. Major challenges facing the project include sea level mitigation, removal of toxic waste, and transportation infrastructure.

A map depicting the current access points for the Port of Oakland and Howard Terminal.

Aaron Wright, ILWU Local 10 business agent, called the stadium nothing short of a “billionaire’s dream,” and said that the A’s have not taken into account the implications of building on such a challenging site. At the event, he urged community members to “say hell no”  to allowing their tax money to subsidize a “billionaire’s condo paradise.”

 

Howard Terminal is a 50-acre site with a single access point via Market Street. It’s one-third of the size of the Coliseum, which spans 150 acres, and is nearly one mile from the nearest BART station.

Wright also takes issue with Howard Terminal being touted as an “unused” site by project supporters.  According to him, the lot serves as an important hub for the hundreds of truckers entering and exiting the port each day, who would otherwise be parking on Oakland streets, clogging the freeways, and increasing pollution in residential West Oakland.

“Howard Terminal actually took that traffic off the streets and gave them a place to stage their loads…it really is a mechanism to keep trucks off the road, to keep trucks out of West Oakland streets,” said Wright.

Due to the spatial restrictions of the lot, the A’s plan to build a substantially smaller parking lot for the stadium, and want to encourage sports fans to leave their cars behind by building a $123 million gondola that would transport up to 6,000 fans per hour per direction from West Oakland BART station to Jack London Square.

Andrew Garcia, president, and director of marine transportation company GoodBulk Ltd addresses Oaklander at the community meeting on Sept. 21. Photo by Saskia Hatvany.

“The west Oakland community — if that stadium is built — will become the parking lot of the Oakland A’s. There is no way that you will be able to control 20 or 30,000 sports fans coming to a stadium on the waterfront,” said Andrew Garcia, president, and director of marine transportation company GoodBulk Ltd., who also spoke at the event.

Another concern for the ILWU is the “turning circle,” a widened part of the estuary where large cargo ships turn around between loading and unloading. The largest ships can barely turn in the existing space and require careful maneuvering from the bar pilots, who have also opposed the stadium over concerns that lights from the new stadium will blind them. As ships get bigger, the Port will no longer be able to accommodate them unless the estuary is adapted, Wright said.

In response to the concerns, the Port of Oakland has laid down its conditions in a project overview and reserved the right to expand the turning basin up to 10 acres of Howard Terminal. The residential development would only be permitted on the side further away from the industrial operations and would have to include a “comprehensive transportation and circulation plan” to ensure that Port operations remain unaffected.

Still, Muhammad suspects that if the project moves forward, there will be larger socio-economic implications.

“This project would be the last few nails in that coffin of gentrification that west Oakland currently finds itself in,” said Muhammad, who expressed skepticism at the 5,000 jobs that the A’s promised to generate with the new ballpark.  He and other industry workers are concerned that the new employment opportunities will consist of low-paying, part-time service jobs — aside from the promised 2,000 construction jobs, which Muhammad argues are temporary.

In addition to the stadium at Howard Terminal, the A’s wish to purchase the Coliseum land from the City of Oakland. Preliminary digital renderings show the 150-acre lot transformed into a large green space surrounding an open-air baseball diamond, flanked by shopping centers, a university campus, and residential areas — including affordable housing.

“Howard Terminal is a 50-acre site…that needs a huge amount of funds to make it buildable. And you could go over to the Coliseum — three times as large, 150 acres — and build three times the stadium and hotel and houses over there, tomorrow,” said Wright.

“It just seems like they’re trying to double dip…and it seems like they’re more interested in developing real estate than just getting a place to play ball,” said Muhammad.

The ILWU is confident that their movement will grow as stadium plans move forward. They are currently working on building alliances with other local industries and non-profits in the area, as well as residents of East Oakland and West Oakland, and urge those who oppose the project to attend future meetings.

The Oakland Post has reached out the the A’s, and welcomes their response to the concerns covered in this article.

For more information about the movement against the Howard Terminal Ballpark, contact Derrick Muhammad at dmuhammad@gmail.com, (510) 435 2713.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

Diabetes in Black California: Turning the Tide from Crisis to Control

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, nearly 17.9% of Black adults in California have been diagnosed with diabetes — above the national Black adult average of 16.8%, and nearly five points higher than California’s overall adult rate of 12.6% across all races. California ranks 24th out of 39 states with available data for Black adult diabetes rates.

Published

on

Dr. Khadijah Lang is a family physician with a clinic in Los Angeles who specializes in several family medical practices, including prenatal care. Lang believes in family medicine. She says it is important to treat all members of a family. Thursday, June 5, 2026. Photo by Solomon O. Smith/California Black Media.
Dr. Khadijah Lang is a family physician with a clinic in Los Angeles who specializes in several family medical practices, including prenatal care. Lang believes in family medicine. She says it is important to treat all members of a family. Thursday, June 5, 2026. Photo by Solomon O. Smith/California Black Media.

By Charlene Muhammad, California Black Media

Crystal Lambert knew something was terribly wrong with her three-year-old granddaughter as she sped down the street trying to get her to the hospital.

“I thought she got a hold of some poison,” Lambert recalled.

Doctors found Lambert’s granddaughter had a blood sugar level over 800, diagnosing her with Diabetic Ketoacidosis(DKA), a state in which the body, starved of insulin, begins to shut down.

Lambert said she was born with a pancreas that was not fully functioning — it lacked the specialized cells required to produce insulin.

Her granddaughter survived and is five years old today.  Now, she gives herself insulin shots, asks endless questions about her condition, and runs like the spirited child she is. But the terror of that night transformed Lambert — and ultimately inspired her to launch the We Fight Back Organization, a mobile health and food access initiative serving underserved communities across California. Lambert is the executive director.

The Crisis by the Numbers

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, nearly 17.9% of Black adults in California have been diagnosed with diabetes — above the national Black adult average of 16.8%, and nearly five points higher than California’s overall adult rate of 12.6% across all races. California ranks 24th out of 39 states with available data for Black adult diabetes rates.

Nationally, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Black Americans were 24% more likely than the overall U.S. population to have diabetes in 2024. They also died from diabetes 78% more often than the general population in 2022. Black Americans are also more than twice as likely as the overall population to develop kidney failure caused by diabetes.

According to the California Health Care Foundation’s 2024 Health Disparities Almanac, Black Californians have the shortest life expectancy in the state at just 74.6 years — due in part to chronic conditions like diabetes and its devastating complications.

Leon Rock, co-founder of the African American Diabetes Association, believes statistics, though revealing, only tell part of the story.

“There are a whole bunch of Black folks that don’t tell you that they have diabetes — or don’t know,” he said.

And the disease itself, Rock is careful to note, is not what kills. “They die from the complications. That’s heart attack, that’s stroke, that’s amputations of legs, of feet. Going blind. All those complications are inherent in a system that has impacted Black folks with diabetes in California and across America.”

Crystal Lambert, creator and executive director of We Fight Back. She started the organization out of a need to learn more about diabetes on behalf of her granddaughter. Now she is looking to spread the impact of her organization to the valley. Friday, June 6, 2026. Photo by Solomon O. Smith/California Black Media.

Crystal Lambert, creator and executive director of the We Fight Back Organization, started out of a need to learn more about diabetes on behalf of her granddaughter. Now she is looking to spread her organization to the valley, on Friday, June 6, 2026 Photo by Solomon O. Smith/ California Black Media

An Information Gap Fuels the Crisis

For Rock, part of the solution is diagnosis. He says the medical and public health systems are failing Black Californians by the absence of information designed for them.

“That is the bottom line. We need good information. Information that is culturally specific,” said Rock.

Telling people to eat healthy or exercise, he added, falls short when culturally specific alternatives are not provided, and when many residents of urban communities do not feel safe exercising in some neighborhoods – or outside at night.

Dr. Khadijah Lang, a family medicine physician and president of the Golden State Medical Association, agrees that the roots of the crisis run deeper than individual behavior — and blaming patients misses the point.

“We are not genetically predisposed to diabetes,” Lang said. “But the system under which we live increases the likelihood that we will develop it.” 

What the Body Needs — What Communities Are Denied

Type 2 diabetes, which accounts for 90 to 95% of all diabetes cases, according to the CDC, develops when the body can no longer use insulin effectively to regulate blood sugar. Left unmanaged, it damages nerves, kidneys, eyes, and the cardiovascular system. The hemoglobin A1C test is a blood draw that reveals how the body has processed sugar over the previous three months — not just at the moment of the test. It is the standard tool for both diagnosis and ongoing monitoring.

That distinction matters, Lang emphasized, because patients cannot manipulate three months of blood sugar history the way they might fast for a day before a single blood draw.

“The pill is not meant to undo or control a sugar level that’s being constantly stressed,” Lang said. “It’s meant to work in conjunction with a low-carbohydrate diet and exercise.” She recommended at minimum 30 minutes of physical activity five days a week — breakable into 10-minute sessions for those who need it.

Lang stressed that education must be delivered in language people recognize and can relate to. The goal is to inform them of the choices that serve their health best, she said.

But for many Black Californians, even those informed choices remain out of reach, Lambert said.

“They need access to healthy foods and medication, too” she said.

California has made some critical policy advances. The state has expanded access to the Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), which has transformed diabetes care for state residents. Assembly Bill 365, introduced in 2024, proposed requiring Medi-Cal to cover the costs of CGM and other related medical equipment but it failed in the State Senate. Since then, the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) reports that the core Medi-Cal CGM benefit now available to eligible patients was solidified through previous budget actions and pharmacy policy updates.

These measures, while meaningful, have not closed the gap for the communities most at risk, according to advocates.

Control Through Community

Health care advocates conclude that the solution must be communal, culturally grounded, and sustained — not a fad, not a celebrity moment, not a single clinic visit. For example, observed Lang, lifestyle shaped by shared values and collective accountability can move the needle where individual prescriptions have not.

Rock is building infrastructure to match the urgency, establishing local chapters of the African American Diabetes Association across the country, with California next.

“We have to do for self, period,” he said. “Health is wealth. We have to eat to live.”

And Lambert, whose granddaughter unknowingly started all of this for her, keeps showing up.

“Diabetes advocacy is about dignity, education, prevention, and hope,” she said.

Video: Diabetes Disparity Exposed in California

This article is supported by the California Health Care Foundation 

(CHCF). Visit www.chcf.org 

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of July 1 – 7, 2026

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of July 1 – 7, 2026

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

NPRC Joins National Grand Jury Proceedings Seeking Accountability, Constitutional Restoration

Organizers state that testimony will explore historical and political developments that they believe have contributed to the expansion of corporate influence over public institutions and governmental decision-making. Participants are expected to discuss concerns regarding constitutional governance, individual liberties, property rights, and the protection of vulnerable populations, including seniors and persons with disabilities.

Published

on

Photo by Billie Powers.
Photo by Billie Powers.

Special to The Post

The National Probate Reform Coalition (NPRC) has joined Toll and Roll and a growing coalition of advocacy organizations, victims, whistleblowers, and citizen groups in support of a nationally broadcast People’s Grand Jury proceeding scheduled for July 1 and July 7.

Organizers describe the event as a public forum designed to examine allegations of government abuse, judicial misconduct, legislative failures, and the erosion of constitutional protections affecting millions of Americans.

The proceedings will feature testimony from victims, families, advocates, and organizations from across the country who contend they have experienced harm through government actions, institutional neglect, and failures of oversight.

According to organizers, the People’s Grand Jury will focus on concerns involving probate courts, guardianships, conservatorships, child welfare systems, property rights, civil liberties, and what participants view as a growing disconnect between government institutions and the constitutional rights of the people they are sworn to serve.

NPRC is participating because many of the issues being examined mirror the concerns raised by advocates, victims, and families who have participated in its monthly town halls. For years, families have reported cases involving exploitation of elders, questionable guardianships, estate depletion, denial of due process, and a lack of meaningful oversight within probate court systems.

“This proceeding gives victims and advocates an opportunity to place their experiences on the public record,” said Tanya Dennis, lead facilitator of NPRC. “For too long, families have struggled to have their voices heard regarding elder abuse, probate exploitation, and government inaction. This forum allows those stories to be shared before a national audience.”

Organizers state that testimony will explore historical and political developments that they believe have contributed to the expansion of corporate influence over public institutions and governmental decision-making. Participants are expected to discuss concerns regarding constitutional governance, individual liberties, property rights, and the protection of vulnerable populations, including seniors and persons with disabilities.

In keeping with principles of transparency and fairness, invitations have been extended to legislators, members of the judiciary, law enforcement representatives, and other public officials who may wish to respond to concerns raised during the proceedings or defend actions taken by their respective institutions.

One of the primary outcomes sought by organizers is public consideration and support for the People’s Remedy and Restoration Act, a proposed legislative framework that advocates believe would strengthen oversight, increase accountability, provide remedies for victims of governmental abuse, and restore constitutional protections.

The proceedings are expected to be broadcast nationally, providing citizens throughout the United States an opportunity to observe testimony, review evidence presented, and participate in an ongoing conversation regarding government accountability and the protection of individual rights.

Advocates hope the hearings will encourage meaningful dialogue, legislative reform, and renewed public engagement in the democratic process.

Individuals, organizations, public officials, and members of the media interested in attending or obtaining access information may contact the organizers at tollandroll2025@gmail.com.

As Americans continue to debate the future of constitutional governance, judicial accountability, and the protection of vulnerable citizens, the July proceedings are expected to serve as a significant forum for public testimony and civic engagement. For more information, go to https://tollandroll.com

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.