Connect with us

Community

Voting YES On Seattle Public Schools Levies Benefits Our Students, Families

THE SEATTLE MEDIUM — Seattle Public Schools has two critical levies on the ballot on Feb. 12. I urge you to vote “yes” on both these levy renewals.

Published

on

By Dwane Chappelle

Seattle Public Schools has two critical levies on the ballot on Feb. 12. I urge you to vote “yes” on both these levy renewals. 

As the former proud principal of Rainier Beach High School, I know how important these levies are to the success of our students, our schools and our staff. Without these levies, we wouldn’t have the critical funds needed to pay for support staff, textbooks and supports for our most vulnerable students. 

Proposition 1 – the Educational Programs and Operations levy – is not a new tax. Renewing this levy provides critical funding of day-to-day school operations. We need this levy to bridge the gap between what the state funds and what all of our students need to be successful.

For example, the state provides Seattle Public Schools with $68 million a year for special education. But in order to meet mandates and to ensure the 7,000 students who need special education services have the supports they need, the district spends $140 million a year for special education. That’s a $72 million gap, which is paid for through local voter-approved levies. Even if the state comes through with additional funds during this year’s legislative session, there’s no way they will come close to closing that yearly funding gap.

If approved, Proposition 2, the capital construction levy, is the only funding means we have to replace, renovate and modernize the schools in the district, as the state does not fully fund construction needs either. This levy will replace eight schools, including enough funding to build a new high school for Rainier Beach. We all see what a safe, modern school building means for students, families and staff. Our school buildings need to reflect the pride we feel about the teaching and learning that’s happening inside those walls.

In deciding how to prioritize which schools would be rebuilt in this cycle, the district relied on a new equity tool, ensuring that our most diverse schools would have priority for major renovations, rebuilds and repairs. In addition, Prop. 2 makes safety and security improvements at every single school, includes funding for classroom technology, and adds about 2,000 classroom seats, while removing 76 portable classrooms. This will help balance class sizes across our district, giving teachers more time to spend with students.

Racial disparities remain in our schools. We must continue to work toward elimination of the systemic academic and opportunity gaps that remain. We would lose momentum in this work if these levies are not renewed. Our schools are making progress, voting YES shows our students that we support them in their academic journey. We care that our students are in safe, welcoming school buildings. That they have the textbooks, computers and staff they need to succeed in school and one day lead this city and nation. 

I hope you will join me in voting YES on these two critical levies. If you need more information, I urge you to check out www.seattleschools.org/levies 

Dwane Chappell is the City of Seattle’s Director for the Department of Education and Early Learning, and served as principal of Rainier Beach High School from 2011-2016

This article originally appeared in The Seattle Medium. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Community

WCCUSD Joins Statewide Organic School Food Purchasing Cooperative

Other districts involved include: Alameda USD, Albany USD, Berkeley USD, Capistrano USD, Cupertino Union SD, Hayward USD, Laguna Beach USD, Lagunitas Elementary SD, Mt. Diablo USD, North Monterey County USD, Pajaro Valley USD, San Leandro USD, San Ramon Valley USD, Santa Clara USD, Sausalito Marin City SD, Tahoe-Truckee USD and West Contra Costa USD.

Published

on

West Contra Costa Unified School District food services team members pose for a photo at Back-to-School Night. Photo courtesy of WCCUSD.

Seventeen California public school districts, including West Contra Costa Unified (WCCUSD), have joined a purchasing cooperative to pool their buying power and expand access to organic food in school meals.

The nonprofit Conscious Kitchen recently announced the launch of the Conscious Organic School Food Purchasing Cooperative. Its founding districts serve more than 300,000 students combined.

The cooperative partnered with food distributors UNFI and Sysco to expand the organic products available to participating districts. Combining schools’ purchasing demand helps distributors plan with suppliers while creating more dependable markets for organic farmers and food makers, according to Conscious Kitchen.

Other eligible California school districts can access the cooperative’s products and pricing through its existing contracts without conducting their own bids. Mt. Diablo Unified School District serves as the lead district for the cooperative’s grocery bid.

Other districts involved include: Alameda USD, Albany USD, Berkeley USD, Capistrano USD, Cupertino Union SD, Hayward USD, Laguna Beach USD, Lagunitas Elementary SD, Mt. Diablo USD, North Monterey County USD, Pajaro Valley USD, San Leandro USD, San Ramon Valley USD, Santa Clara USD, Sausalito Marin City SD, Tahoe-Truckee USD and West Contra Costa USD.

Barbara Jellison, WCCUSD’s executive director of food services, said the cooperative builds on years of work bringing fresh, organic food into school kitchens.

“The next challenge has always been how to make that possible for more districts,” Jellison said. “The Co-op gives schools a way to take what we have learned and move it to a completely different scale.”

Continue Reading

Community

Democrats, Community Groups Back Measure EE to Change How Oakland Is Governed

Along with clearer executive responsibility, the Charter reform would also create new checks and balances, including an independent Budget and Legislative Analyst office, City Council confirmation of key appointments, expanded council hearing and subpoena authority, and give the council the ability to override a mayoral veto with six votes.

Published

on

Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee. Courtesy of Mayor Barbara Lee’s office.

The Alameda County Democratic Party has voted to endorse Measure EE, the Oakland Charter reform measure on the November 2026 ballot. The party’s endorsement is announced alongside a broad coalition of organizations spanning labor, business, faith, and community advocacy, including Oakland Rising Action that are also supporting the measure.

Those supporters include:

  • League of Women Voters of Oakland
  • AFSCME Council 57
  • SPUR
  • Bay Area Council
  • Black Women Organized for Political Action
  • Faith in Action East Bay
  • Oakland Chamber of Commerce
  • Oakland Rising Action
  • Revitalize East Bay
  • Empower Oakland

Measure EE would reform Oakland’s hybrid governance system by establishing a strong-mayor structure, making the mayor the city’s chief executive, responsible for delivering effective, efficient services.

The measure would also reform and expand responsibilities of City Councilmembers.

Measure EE would create clearer lines of responsibility for the performance of city government, allowing voters to evaluate the mayor based on how effectively the city delivers services and produces results.

Along with clearer executive responsibility, the Charter reform would also create new checks and balances, including an independent Budget and Legislative Analyst office, City Council confirmation of key appointments, expanded council hearing and subpoena authority, and give the council the ability to override a mayoral veto with six votes. 

“Oakland voters deserve a City Hall where they know exactly who’s responsible when something goes wrong and exactly who to credit when it gets fixed. Measure EE puts that responsibility squarely with the mayor, backed by real checks and balances, so Oakland can finally move as fast as its problems demand. That’s why the Alameda County Democratic Party is proud to stand behind it,” said Igor Tregub, chair of the Alameda County Democratic Party. 

Oakland Rising Action, a collaboration of racial, economic, and environmental justice organizations, has also issued a press statement explaining its support for Measure EE.

Measure EE “represents a critical opportunity for residents to clarify the governance role of the Oakland Mayor and City Council, so we, as residents, know who to hold accountable for the execution of voter-approved and budgeted services within city departments,” the statement said.

Measure EE would reform Oakland’s Charter, which is the city’s Constitution, strengthening “the role of the mayor as the CEO of Oakland, with the city administrator being hired and managed by the mayor explicitly.”

The measure would also strengthen oversight of city departments by mandating reporting directly to the City Council and provide the mayor with veto power in approving policies and the budget.

Measure EE was placed on the ballot by the Oakland City Council in June 2026. For more than half a year, the mayor’s working group on Charter reform engaged residents and elected officials on the options for governance of Oakland, which led to Measure EE. 

“Oaklanders need clarity about who is responsible for the management of our city departments, our tax dollars, and our voter-approved ballot measures,” said Pecolia Manigo, executive director of Oakland Rising. 

“The average resident believes that we already have a strong mayor system,” she continued. “However, this is simply not the truth in our City Charter. It is time for us to stop talking about the Charter changes Oakland needs. This is the first of many Charter reforms that are needed to improve conditions in Oakland, especially the flatlands. It’s time all voters start paying attention to who is making decisions for Oakland. This election allows us to say how we believe Oakland should be governed.”

Continue Reading

Business

Veterans Housing Project Proposed for South Richmond

According to the development team’s presentation, the project has an estimated total cost of nearly $158 million. The presentation outlines five phases encompassing entitlement and construction documents, community outreach, soil remediation and utility work, podium and building construction, solar technology integration, and interior buildouts.

Published

on

Artist’s rendering of the complex that will have xx units for veterans. Courtesy image.

A proposed mixed-use development at 338 Carlson Blvd. could bring hundreds of homes and support services for military veterans to South Richmond.

Led by the Richmond-based Veterans Resource Program in partnership with Eagle Environmental Construction & Development, the proposal covers an approximately 2.3-acre property the nonprofit acquired in 2018.

The proposal features a multi-building residential development with various apartment sizes, though city documents and developer materials cite conflicting totals ranging from 226 to 268 units.

The proposal also includes approximately 40,000 square feet of commercial and retail space, about 200 parking spaces, and an entrepreneurial training and job-development component intended to connect veterans with economic and workforce opportunities.

According to the development team’s presentation, the project has an estimated total cost of nearly $158 million. The presentation outlines five phases encompassing entitlement and construction documents, community outreach, soil remediation and utility work, podium and building construction, solar technology integration, and interior buildouts.

Founded in 2011, the Veterans Resource Program provides housing assistance and other services to veterans, including those experiencing homelessness or transitioning from incarceration.

The proposal aims to advance Richmond’s affordable housing goals while connecting veterans with housing and supportive services. Details of affordability and veteran eligibility remain to be clarified.

The Richmond City Council was scheduled to receive an informational presentation on the project at its Oct. 6 meeting, following a continuance from Sept. 22. The item does not seek project approval or city funding. Any future request for city financial assistance or other public resources would require separate consideration and approval.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.