Connect with us

Uncategorized

After Community Complaints of Quan’s Staff’s Mishandling of $4.1 Million Job Funds,State Requires City to Hold New Hearing

Published

on

Deborah Barnes

Jean Quan

Deanna Santana

By Ken A. Epstein

The state has thrown out the results of a hearing conducted by the City of Oakland on a complaint filed by 16 local nonprofits and community leaders who alleged the Oakland Workforce Investment Board had botched the legally required procedures for a fair and open opportunity for agencies to apply for federal jobs funds.
At stake are as much as $4.1 million in jobs funding, including $1.5 million for youth jobs, depending on how much money Oakland receives in the new federal budget
“The city did not meet the requirements” of legal regulations that require agencies that distribute federal funds to “seek impartial hearing officers” in handling complaints, according to a letter sent to John Bailey, director of the Oakland Workforce Investment Board (WIB) by the state Employment Development Department (EDD).
“The city chose a hearing officer that was directly involved with the issues concerning this complaint,” and therefore a new hearing “should be held before an impartial hearing officer within 30 days of receipt of this letter,” the March 25 letter signed by Jessie Mar, Chief of the EDD’s Compliance Review Office.
Under federal regulations, those who filed the original complaint must be notified 10 days in advance of the time and place of the new hearing.
The complaint had been filed against the Oakland WIB, which is overseen by the City Administrator, and the city hearing had been conducted by Deborah Barnes, who is director of the Compliance and Contracts Division for the City Administrator.
Barnes on March 8 issued a decision denying the complainant’s request to declare the process “a failed procurement” and to conduct a new process “in consultation with relevant federal and state authorities.”
In a response, the City Administrator’s Office said: “We were surprised by the EDD Compliance Review Office’s findings, particularly since the ruling was issued without the benefit of consultation with the city. We look forward to presenting the full facts, which demonstrate that the city took significant steps to be collaborative and transparent with the complainants in order to ensure an impartial hearing.”
The current complaint is the latest in public missteps in the city’s handling of federal jobs funds. It was recently brought to light that the city had to return $600,000 for on-the-job training to the state because the WIB had failed by make use of the money by the deadline, despite frequent warnings.
In addition, the WIB is also under community scrutiny for proposing to distribute youth jobs money to nonprofits, leaving out agencies that serve young people in West Oakland and Latino youth in the Fruitvale District.
The original complaint was filed on Dec. 17 against a Request for Proposals released by the city and the WIB in October, alleging that the process was mismanaged.
Among many issues, the complaint cited failure by the city to follow federal and state guidelines governing bidders’ conferences including the opportunity for questions and answers so that agencies would have “a clear understanding of contract requirements.”
Further, the city’s “i Supplier” on-line question and answer system did not function for several weeks, “resulting in two postponements of the original due date for the RFPs,” the complaint said.
The notice of the RFP postponement was “improperly disseminated to potential bidders,” providing some agencies with notice in advance of others. In addition, the complaint said funding levels in the RFPs “were not the subject of a transparent, public process, nor were they reviewed or authorized by the Oakland WIB prior to their inclusion in the RFPs,” depriving the public body appointed by the mayor of the opportunity to exercise its duty to oversee the process.
The complaint also requested “safeguards be established by the city to prohibit retaliation by any member of city/WIB staff.”
The reasons for making the complaint, according to the signers, were that the city’s mistakes had a “cumulative impact” that denied “the basic principles of fairness and a ‘level playing’ to all potential bidders and significantly contaminate(d) their morale and interest in the process…The possibility of effective collaborations…has been undermined by the chaotic atmosphere surrounding the procurement process.”
The 16 signers of the complaint included Bikes for Life, OCCUR, Pivotal Point Youth Services, Spanish Speaking Citizens’ Foundation, George P. Scotlan Youth and Family Center, Oakland Private Industry Council, Black Elected Officials and Faith Based Leaders of the East Bay, Oakland NAACP and Jumoke Hinton Hodge, the member of the Board of Education who represents West Oakland.
The city’s hearing on the complaint was held on Feb. 14, and Deborah Barnes issued her decision on March 8, giving 10 reasons for rejecting the complaint.
“With the matter of fairness and transparency as well as fair and equitable opportunities for all participating/potential proposers … it is believed that these actions did not rise to the level of material impact justifying the remedies …requested by the claimants,” Barnes wrote in her decision.
The response from City Administrator’s office said: “It is not improper for city staff to act as a hearing officer as long as the person is neither directly affected by nor will implement the final resolution of the complaint, as is the case in this situation,”
“We will ask EDD for a full review of all the facts and an opportunity to submit details demonstrating the steps we took to meet, and exceed, the requirements for an impartial hearing.”
As of press time, the Post had not received a response from the Mayor’s office.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Not Just a Southern Issue: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

OAKLAND POST — Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions.

Published

on

Shutterstock

By Edward Henderson, California Black Media

U.S. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) whose district spans parts of Los Angeles County, joined fellow CBC member U.S. Rep. Troy Carter (D-LA-2) for a May 21 briefing with Black media outlets in California. 

The lawmakers highlighted what they describe as a mounting threat to Black political representation resulting from an April 29 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections under the federal Voting Rights Act.  

Kamlager-Dove and Carter warned that the decision, which narrowed the role of race in redistricting, is already reshaping congressional districts across the South and undermining Black voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice.

“While we are a super blue state, we have far to go when it comes to Black representation; we tend to take that for granted,” Kamlager-Dove said of California, noting that the Golden State has the fifth largest Black population in the country and only has three Black members of Congress.   

“While I support building coalitions, we have to make sure that as a Black community we are not yielding our power,” she added.

Calling the fight “not unique to the South,” Carter urged Black communities nationwide to recognize the broader implications of the legal and political battles unfolding in Southern legislatures and courtrooms. 

The Supreme Court ruling centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the portion of the law that prohibits voting systems or district maps that dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. For decades, Section 2 allowed civil rights groups to challenge district maps that weakened Black political representation even when lawmakers did not openly state discriminatory intent.

Now, advocates fear that standard has fundamentally changed. 

“You have to have smoking gun evidence,” said Mitchell Brown, senior voting rights counsel at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, during a recent media briefing hosted by American Community Media on May 15. “Legislators are not going to say the quiet part out loud.” 

The implications could stretch far beyond congressional elections, Brown said.  

Section 2 protections have historically applied not only to U.S. House districts, but also to state legislatures, school boards, county commissions, judgeships, and local governing bodies. Voting rights advocates warn that weakening those protections could reshape political representation throughout the South, particularly in states with large Black populations. 

“This is not just a Southern issue,” said Amir Badat, manager of Black Voters on the Rise and voting special counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Badat described the current moment as part of a much longer historical pattern. 

Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions. 

“This is the same move,” Badat said.

Advocates also emphasized that the consequences of weakened voting protections extend into everyday life. 

Local elected offices such as school boards, city councils, county commissions, and judgeships often determine funding priorities, public safety policy, education standards, and infrastructure investments.

“These are not abstract numbers,” Badat said. “These have real political consequences and policy consequences on people’s day-to-day lives.” 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rest in Peace: A.M.E. Pastor and L.A Civil Rights Icon Cecil “Chip” Murray Passes

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94. “Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Published

on

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94.

“Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Murray oversaw the growth of FAME’s congregation from 250 members to 18,000.

“My heart is with the First AME congregation and community today as we reflect on a legacy that changed this city forever,” Bass continued.

Murray served as Senior Minister at FAME, the oldest Black congregation in the city, for 27 years. During that time, various dignitaries visited and he built strong relationships with political and civic leaders in the city and across the state, as well as a number of Hollywood figures. Several national political leaders also visited with Murray and his congregation at FAME, including Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

Murray, a Florida native and U.S. Air Force vet, attended Florida A&M University, where he majored in history, worked on the school newspaper and pledged Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity.  He later attended Claremont School of Theology in Los Angeles County, where he earned his doctorate in Divinity.

Murray is survived by his son Drew. His wife Bernadine, who was a committed member of the A.M.E. church and the daughter of his childhood pastor, died in 2013.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Court Throws Out Law That Allowed Californians to Build Duplexes, Triplexes and RDUs on Their Properties

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional. Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

Published

on

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional.

Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of the cities, pointing out that SB 9 discredited charter cities that were granted jurisdiction to create new governance systems and enact policy reforms. The court ruling affects 121 charter cities that have local constitutions.

Attorney Pam Lee represented five Southern California cities in the lawsuit against the state and Attorney General Rob Bonta.

“This is a monumental victory for all charter cities in California,” Lee said.

However, general law cities are excluded from the court ruling as state housing laws still apply in residential areas.

Attorney General Bonta and his team are working to review the decision and consider all options that will protect SB 9 as a state law. Bonta said the law has helped provide affordable housing for residents in California.

“Our statewide housing shortage and affordability crisis requires collaboration, innovation, and a good faith effort by local governments to increase the housing supply,” Bonta said.

“SB9 is an important tool in this effort, and we’re going to make sure homeowners have the opportunity to utilize it,” he said.

Charter cities remain adamant that the state should refrain from making land-use decisions on their behalf. In the lawsuit, city representatives argued that SB 9 eliminates local authority to create single-family zoning districts and approve housing developments.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.