Connect with us

Uncategorized

Cientos llaman al boicot de restaurante Calavera después de supuestos abusos laborales

Published

on

Cientos de trabajadores de restaurantes y miembros de la comunidad están llamando a un boicot de Calavera, un restaurante mexicano situado en el centro de Oakland, después que varios trabajadores de cocina fueron despedidos de un puesto de trabajo el cual dicen estaba plagado de abuso y robo de salarios. 

 

Flor Crisostomo, originaria de Oaxaca, México, y otros cuatro colegas han presentado una demanda colectiva en contra de los propietarios del restaurante Christopher Pastena y Michael Iglesias diciendo que ellos repetidamente violan las leyes laborales.

 

Esto incluye que no pagan el salario mínimo, fallando para compensar las horas extraordinarias y no dando tiempo legal para descansos y almuerzo, dicen los ex empleados.

 

“Cuando trabajábamos allí, comenzaron a despedir a trabajadores por medio de mensaje de texto o los sacaban de la programación sin decir nada”, dijo Crisóstomo en una entrevista con el Post. “Algunos de nosotros trabajábamos durante 12 o 14 horas seguidas sin descanso y no sabíamos nuestros derechos”.

 

Crisostomo también dice que los propietarios la utilizaron para apropiarse de las recetas tradicionales de la comida de Oaxaca -como tamales y moles- que ella les enseñaba como alguien autóctona de la región mexicana.

 

Para el cierre de esta edición, los propietarios de Calavera no respondieron a las peticiones del Post para sus comentarios sobre estas afirmaciones.

 

Flor Crisostomo. Photo courtesy of Brooke Anderson Photography.

Flor Crisostomo. Photo courtesy of Brooke Anderson Photography.

 

Para Crisostomo, la experiencia la ha llevado a ella y varios otros empleados de restaurantes a llamar a la acción de la comunidad en la educación de los trabajadores inmigrantes de sus derechos laborales y revelando a los clientes las condiciones que las personas que trabajan en las cocinas se enfrentan a menudo.

 

Después de ser despedido de la Calavera, los trabajadores formaron el Movimiento de Trabajadores de Restaurantes del Área de la Bahía (BARWM por sus siglas en inglés) para llamar la atención sobre los derechos laborales locales.

 

Durante el Primer Viernes de la semana pasada, más de 100 personas protestaron afuera de Calavera y realizaron una manifestación para los ex empleados, pidiendo reparaciones por el robo de salarios y el abuso que dicen que enfrentan los trabajadores inmigrantes e ilustrando a clientes potenciales de sus experiencias.

 

“Los trabajadores indocumentados son los más propensos a ser explotados debido al hecho de que tienen poco conocimiento de las leyes laborales en los estados donde están empleados,” dijo Shonda Roberts, de la Asamblea de salario digno en Oakland.

 

“Muchos de nuestros hermanos y hermanas que no poseen documentos también no hablan en contra del abuso porque tienen miedo a las represalias y a ser despedidos”, dijo Roberts.

 

De acuerdo con BARWM, el derechos de los trabajadores se compone de un descanso de 10 minutos después de cuatro horas de trabajo, una pausa para el almuerzo después de cinco horas y media de trabajo, un salario mínimo de $12.55 por hora y días de enfermedad pagados después de 90 días de trabajo.

 

“La mayoría de los trabajadores de la cocina son personas de color y Oakland gana el quinto lugar más alto de ingresos para los restaurantes en el país”, dijo Crisóstomo. “Hacemos un llamado a la comunidad de Oakland para ayudar a construir un movimiento consciente de la justicia.”

 

“Entiendo las condiciones de muchos de mis colegas de trabajo bajo el temor de ser despedidos si se ponen de pie por sus derechos. Pero la violación de nuestros derechos seguirá ocurriendo a menos que hagamos algo al respecto”, dijo.

 

Uncategorized

Not Just a Southern Issue: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

OAKLAND POST — Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions.

Published

on

Shutterstock

By Edward Henderson, California Black Media

U.S. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) whose district spans parts of Los Angeles County, joined fellow CBC member U.S. Rep. Troy Carter (D-LA-2) for a May 21 briefing with Black media outlets in California. 

The lawmakers highlighted what they describe as a mounting threat to Black political representation resulting from an April 29 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections under the federal Voting Rights Act.  

Kamlager-Dove and Carter warned that the decision, which narrowed the role of race in redistricting, is already reshaping congressional districts across the South and undermining Black voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice.

“While we are a super blue state, we have far to go when it comes to Black representation; we tend to take that for granted,” Kamlager-Dove said of California, noting that the Golden State has the fifth largest Black population in the country and only has three Black members of Congress.   

“While I support building coalitions, we have to make sure that as a Black community we are not yielding our power,” she added.

Calling the fight “not unique to the South,” Carter urged Black communities nationwide to recognize the broader implications of the legal and political battles unfolding in Southern legislatures and courtrooms. 

The Supreme Court ruling centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the portion of the law that prohibits voting systems or district maps that dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. For decades, Section 2 allowed civil rights groups to challenge district maps that weakened Black political representation even when lawmakers did not openly state discriminatory intent.

Now, advocates fear that standard has fundamentally changed. 

“You have to have smoking gun evidence,” said Mitchell Brown, senior voting rights counsel at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, during a recent media briefing hosted by American Community Media on May 15. “Legislators are not going to say the quiet part out loud.” 

The implications could stretch far beyond congressional elections, Brown said.  

Section 2 protections have historically applied not only to U.S. House districts, but also to state legislatures, school boards, county commissions, judgeships, and local governing bodies. Voting rights advocates warn that weakening those protections could reshape political representation throughout the South, particularly in states with large Black populations. 

“This is not just a Southern issue,” said Amir Badat, manager of Black Voters on the Rise and voting special counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Badat described the current moment as part of a much longer historical pattern. 

Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions. 

“This is the same move,” Badat said.

Advocates also emphasized that the consequences of weakened voting protections extend into everyday life. 

Local elected offices such as school boards, city councils, county commissions, and judgeships often determine funding priorities, public safety policy, education standards, and infrastructure investments.

“These are not abstract numbers,” Badat said. “These have real political consequences and policy consequences on people’s day-to-day lives.” 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rest in Peace: A.M.E. Pastor and L.A Civil Rights Icon Cecil “Chip” Murray Passes

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94. “Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Published

on

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94.

“Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Murray oversaw the growth of FAME’s congregation from 250 members to 18,000.

“My heart is with the First AME congregation and community today as we reflect on a legacy that changed this city forever,” Bass continued.

Murray served as Senior Minister at FAME, the oldest Black congregation in the city, for 27 years. During that time, various dignitaries visited and he built strong relationships with political and civic leaders in the city and across the state, as well as a number of Hollywood figures. Several national political leaders also visited with Murray and his congregation at FAME, including Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

Murray, a Florida native and U.S. Air Force vet, attended Florida A&M University, where he majored in history, worked on the school newspaper and pledged Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity.  He later attended Claremont School of Theology in Los Angeles County, where he earned his doctorate in Divinity.

Murray is survived by his son Drew. His wife Bernadine, who was a committed member of the A.M.E. church and the daughter of his childhood pastor, died in 2013.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Court Throws Out Law That Allowed Californians to Build Duplexes, Triplexes and RDUs on Their Properties

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional. Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

Published

on

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional.

Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of the cities, pointing out that SB 9 discredited charter cities that were granted jurisdiction to create new governance systems and enact policy reforms. The court ruling affects 121 charter cities that have local constitutions.

Attorney Pam Lee represented five Southern California cities in the lawsuit against the state and Attorney General Rob Bonta.

“This is a monumental victory for all charter cities in California,” Lee said.

However, general law cities are excluded from the court ruling as state housing laws still apply in residential areas.

Attorney General Bonta and his team are working to review the decision and consider all options that will protect SB 9 as a state law. Bonta said the law has helped provide affordable housing for residents in California.

“Our statewide housing shortage and affordability crisis requires collaboration, innovation, and a good faith effort by local governments to increase the housing supply,” Bonta said.

“SB9 is an important tool in this effort, and we’re going to make sure homeowners have the opportunity to utilize it,” he said.

Charter cities remain adamant that the state should refrain from making land-use decisions on their behalf. In the lawsuit, city representatives argued that SB 9 eliminates local authority to create single-family zoning districts and approve housing developments.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.