Connect with us

Uncategorized

La ciudad quiere que los propietarios paguen a los inquilinos más por convertir los apartamentos en condominios

Published

on

El Comité del Ayuntamiento Comunidad y Desarrollo Económico (CED) retrasó una decisión del martes en una propuesta para aumentar los pagos de reubicación a inquilinos que son echados de sus apartamentos a través de la Ley de desalojos Ellis.

 

 

 

La Ley de Ellis es una ley estatal que permite a los desalojos, cuando los propietarios optan por tomar las propiedades fuera del mercado de alquiler. Esta ley se ha convertido infame en San Francisco, que se utiliza para desplazar a cientos de inquilinos por propietarios que deseaban convertir unidades de alquiler de condominios a precio de mercado.

 

 

Aunque la Ley Ellis no se ha utilizado ampliamente en Oakland, los documentos presentados en el marco del acto de este año se han cuadruplicado a 12 desalojos, más de los cuatro el año pasado.

 

 

La propuesta de la ciudad extendería los pagos de reubicación a todos los inquilinos sujetos a la Ley Ellis, si son o no son de bajos ingresos, y aumentaría los pagos a los $8,000 por unidad de alquiler, más un extra de $ 2.500 por unidad a “inquilinos vulnerables”, como las personas mayores, inquilinos discapacitados e inquilinos con hijos menores de edad.

 

 

Los inquilinos afectados recibirían la mitad del pago en el momento de la notificación y la otra mitad en su fecha de mudanza.

 

 

Similares Ordenanzas de pago de reubicación ya están en marcha en varias ciudades de todo el área de la bahía, incluyendo San Francisco y Berkeley, donde las tasas son $5.500 por inquilino y $ 8.700 por unidad, respectivamente.

 

 

Actualmente, los pagos de reubicación de Oakland para desalojos por la Ley Ellis se restringen a los inquilinos de bajos ingresos y se limitan a dos meses de alquiler de los inquilinos en el momento de la notificación de desalojo.

 

 

“Con el aumento de los alquileres en Oakland, en virtud de la ordenanza actual, las personas que son desalojadas no tienen la compensación que necesitan para reubicarse”, dijo Connie Taylor, directora del Programa de Ajuste de Alquiler de Oakland, al hablar en la reunión de CED.

 

 

Otros oradores en la reunión plantearon una serie de preocupaciones sobre la ordenanza propuesta.

 

 

Los dueños de propiedades, representando la Asociación de Alquiler de Vivienda de East Bay, no se opusieron a las expansiones de pago de reubicación, pero expresaron su preocupación por la ordenanza permitiendo posiblemente a los inquilinos para impugnar legalmente el desalojo después de haber recibido su primera mitad de pago de reubicación.

 

 

En respuesta, la Vice alcalde Kaplan, que respaldó la ordenanza, dijo que al aceptar el primer pago, los inquilinos estarían firmando en su derecho a impugnar legalmente el desalojo.

 

 

Mientras tanto, los grupos de derechos como el Centro de Ley de la Comunidad del Este de la Bahía (EBCLC) y la Unión de Inquilinos de Oakland dijeron que la propuesta va en un largo camino para traer la ordenanza de Ley Ellis de Oakland a la par con el resto del área de la bahía, pero se queda corta en hacer cumplir que los inquilinos recibirán sus pagos de reubicación completa.

 

 

“La ordenanza no requiere contabilización de los fondos de reubicación con cualquier agencia de la ciudad al igual que otras ciudades hacen para asegurar que las cuotas se reciben”, dijo Ubaldo Fernández, un abogado de personal de la EBCLC.

 

 

La Concejal Lynette McElhaney también tenía preocupaciones sobre la actual propuesta, diciendo que es necesario que haya una manera “para añadir protecciones alrededor de los propietarios de bajos ingresos desalojando a inquilinos con ingresos más altos y teniendo que pagar.”

 

 

McElhaney dijo que estaba preocupada de que las ordenanzas de este tipo, aunque bien intencionados, podrían estar más lejos de ayudar al desplazamiento alentando a los propietarios de bajos ingresos -los más probables para cargar alquiler a precio de mercado- a vender sus propiedades a las empresas con más probabilidades de cobrar más caro.

 

 

“Tenemos que hacer un análisis adicional para ver”, dijo.

 

 

Mientras tanto, concejal Larry Reid favoreció posponer la propuesta para una fecha posterior, cuestionando si hay alguna urgencia en la aprobación de la ordenanza.

 

 

El Pastor Sandhya Jha, director de los programas interreligiosos en Organizaciones de Viviendas de East Bay (EBHO), dijo que estas protecciones a la Ley Ellis se necesitan con urgencia.

 

 

“Como alguien que ha visto un tercio de mi comunidad de fe quedarse relegados fuera de Oakland – gente trabajadora que querían seguir siendo un tejido de esta ciudad – esto es importante para mí como una persona de fe y alguien profundamente comprometido con la preservación de lo que es grandioso de esta ciudad”, dijo.

 

 

El Personal de la Ciudad presentará un informe sobre la ordenanza Ley Ellis el 12 de enero del próximo año, después de considerar la planteada opinión del público en la reunión del CED.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Not Just a Southern Issue: Advocates Say SCOTUS Voting Rights Decision Has Already Started to Reshape Black Political Power

OAKLAND POST — Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions.

Published

on

Shutterstock

By Edward Henderson, California Black Media

U.S. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA-37), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) whose district spans parts of Los Angeles County, joined fellow CBC member U.S. Rep. Troy Carter (D-LA-2) for a May 21 briefing with Black media outlets in California. 

The lawmakers highlighted what they describe as a mounting threat to Black political representation resulting from an April 29 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakened key protections under the federal Voting Rights Act.  

Kamlager-Dove and Carter warned that the decision, which narrowed the role of race in redistricting, is already reshaping congressional districts across the South and undermining Black voters’ ability to elect candidates of their choice.

“While we are a super blue state, we have far to go when it comes to Black representation; we tend to take that for granted,” Kamlager-Dove said of California, noting that the Golden State has the fifth largest Black population in the country and only has three Black members of Congress.   

“While I support building coalitions, we have to make sure that as a Black community we are not yielding our power,” she added.

Calling the fight “not unique to the South,” Carter urged Black communities nationwide to recognize the broader implications of the legal and political battles unfolding in Southern legislatures and courtrooms. 

The Supreme Court ruling centers on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the portion of the law that prohibits voting systems or district maps that dilute the voting strength of racial minorities. For decades, Section 2 allowed civil rights groups to challenge district maps that weakened Black political representation even when lawmakers did not openly state discriminatory intent.

Now, advocates fear that standard has fundamentally changed. 

“You have to have smoking gun evidence,” said Mitchell Brown, senior voting rights counsel at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, during a recent media briefing hosted by American Community Media on May 15. “Legislators are not going to say the quiet part out loud.” 

The implications could stretch far beyond congressional elections, Brown said.  

Section 2 protections have historically applied not only to U.S. House districts, but also to state legislatures, school boards, county commissions, judgeships, and local governing bodies. Voting rights advocates warn that weakening those protections could reshape political representation throughout the South, particularly in states with large Black populations. 

“This is not just a Southern issue,” said Amir Badat, manager of Black Voters on the Rise and voting special counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Badat described the current moment as part of a much longer historical pattern. 

Following the Civil War and Reconstruction, constitutional amendments expanded Black citizenship and voting rights across the South, leading to dramatic increases in Black political representation. But those gains were quickly met with violent backlash and the rise of Jim Crow laws designed to suppress Black voting through poll taxes, literacy tests, and other “race-neutral” restrictions. 

“This is the same move,” Badat said.

Advocates also emphasized that the consequences of weakened voting protections extend into everyday life. 

Local elected offices such as school boards, city councils, county commissions, and judgeships often determine funding priorities, public safety policy, education standards, and infrastructure investments.

“These are not abstract numbers,” Badat said. “These have real political consequences and policy consequences on people’s day-to-day lives.” 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rest in Peace: A.M.E. Pastor and L.A Civil Rights Icon Cecil “Chip” Murray Passes

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94. “Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Published

on

The Rev. Dr. Cecil L. “Chip” Murray, former pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church (FAME) in Los Angeles, died of natural causes April 6 at his Windsor Hills Home. He was 94.

“Today, we lost a giant. Reverend Dr. Cecil Murray dedicated his life to service, community, and putting God first in all things. I had the absolute honor of working with him, worshiping with him, and seeking his counsel,” said Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of the dynamic religious leader whose ministry inspired and attracted millionaires as well as former gang bangers and people dealing with substance use disorder (SUD).

Murray oversaw the growth of FAME’s congregation from 250 members to 18,000.

“My heart is with the First AME congregation and community today as we reflect on a legacy that changed this city forever,” Bass continued.

Murray served as Senior Minister at FAME, the oldest Black congregation in the city, for 27 years. During that time, various dignitaries visited and he built strong relationships with political and civic leaders in the city and across the state, as well as a number of Hollywood figures. Several national political leaders also visited with Murray and his congregation at FAME, including Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

Murray, a Florida native and U.S. Air Force vet, attended Florida A&M University, where he majored in history, worked on the school newspaper and pledged Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity.  He later attended Claremont School of Theology in Los Angeles County, where he earned his doctorate in Divinity.

Murray is survived by his son Drew. His wife Bernadine, who was a committed member of the A.M.E. church and the daughter of his childhood pastor, died in 2013.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Court Throws Out Law That Allowed Californians to Build Duplexes, Triplexes and RDUs on Their Properties

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional. Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

Published

on

Charter cities in California won a lawsuit last week against the state that declared Senate Bill (SB) 9, a pro-housing bill, unconstitutional.

Passed in 2021, SB 9 is also known as the California Housing Opportunity and More Efficiency Act (HOME). That law permits up to four residential units — counting individual units of duplexes, triplexes and residential dwelling units (RDUs) – to be built on properties in neighborhoods that were previously zoned for only single-family homes.

A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge ruled in favor of the cities, pointing out that SB 9 discredited charter cities that were granted jurisdiction to create new governance systems and enact policy reforms. The court ruling affects 121 charter cities that have local constitutions.

Attorney Pam Lee represented five Southern California cities in the lawsuit against the state and Attorney General Rob Bonta.

“This is a monumental victory for all charter cities in California,” Lee said.

However, general law cities are excluded from the court ruling as state housing laws still apply in residential areas.

Attorney General Bonta and his team are working to review the decision and consider all options that will protect SB 9 as a state law. Bonta said the law has helped provide affordable housing for residents in California.

“Our statewide housing shortage and affordability crisis requires collaboration, innovation, and a good faith effort by local governments to increase the housing supply,” Bonta said.

“SB9 is an important tool in this effort, and we’re going to make sure homeowners have the opportunity to utilize it,” he said.

Charter cities remain adamant that the state should refrain from making land-use decisions on their behalf. In the lawsuit, city representatives argued that SB 9 eliminates local authority to create single-family zoning districts and approve housing developments.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.