Connect with us

Economics

Special Ed Support Staff Plan to Support a Teacher Strike

Published

on

While special education support staff in the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) broadly back the Oakland Education Association’s (OEA) proposed strike and its demands to increase funding for educators and students, some feel they’ll be unable to show that support by refusing to work.

“Schools have been underfunded in California since I was in high school at least,” said Kaylie Bengston, who works as a paraprofessional educator in a class at Montera Middle School. “It’s about time someone did something about it.”

Bengston was hired through Ro Health, an agency that has a contract with OUSD. She provides one on one support for a student with special needs. She’d love to not work during a strike, but due to her 17 dollars an hour salary and the Bay Area’s high cost of living, she can’t afford to miss work.

In anticipation of a likely upcoming strike, OEA has arranged for interest free loans and needs based grants for its members who are willing to serve on the picket line. But since Bengston along with other Ro Health employees are ununionized and not part of the OEA, they won’t be able to access those services.

Bengston’s financial situation is similar to many other special education support staff workers in OUSD who work multiple jobs yet can’t afford to live in Oakland as they aren’t paid a living wage. She has a second job at a fabric store and lives in a two bedroom apartment in Hayward with two roommates, one who lives in the living room.

Sarah Wilson*, who’s worked directly for OUSD as an instructional support specialist for special ed students for over a dozen years, plans to support the strike by scheduling doctor appointments she’s needed anyway during the strike’s first days. If the strike lasts more than a few days, she’ll return to work because she can’t afford to go without wages. Wilson is unionized through Service Employees International Union (SEIU) 1021 instead of OEA so she also won’t be able to access OEA’s finical aid services.

Although Wilson grew up in Oakland, she can’t afford housing here. She’s been homeless for the last two years and alternates between staying with friends, housesitting, and sleeping in her vehicle. She makes about 23 dollars an hour which has not been enough, even with supplement income from three part time jobs, for her to find housing in her hometown.

She thinks she should be paid a lot more for her job which requires a bachelors degree, specialized skills, and in-depth knowledge and understanding of autism.

OEA 1st vice president Ismael Armendariz agrees that special ed support staff deserve higher wages. Since special education support staff are not in OEA, they will have to negotiate separately, but Armendariz thinks the teacher’s fight to secure more funding will help special ed support staff in their negotiations.

“The funding we’re fighting for is not just for classroom teachers, but for all education professionals,” said Armendariz.

OEA is encouraging special education support staff who work during the strike to stick exclusively to their job duties and not take on the duties of classroom teachers as they’re concerned with administrators pressuring support staff to perform tasks outside of their training which could put them in unsafe situations. Also, if special ed support staff replace teachers, the strike would become less strong.

Sarah Wilson plans on sticking exclusively to her small group of autistic students and is concerned for their safety. She hopes that parents keep them home if a strike occurs.

“Having my students in with the entire school population would be a disaster, and unsafe. I hope parents keep them home as I worry about the level of support that will be available to them,” said Wilson.

*Sarah Wilson is a pseudonym for this person, who prefers to remain anonymous to protect their job security.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

California Launches Study on Mileage Tax to Potentially Replace Gas Tax as Republicans Push Back

Under current law, California depends heavily on revenue from the gas tax to fund roads, highways, and infrastructure, but those revenues are projected to shrink as electric vehicle use grows and overall gasoline consumption drops. The mileage study would look at a “road charge” system where drivers pay based on how many miles they drive, rather than how much gas they buy. 

Published

on

Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D-Suisun City is the author of AB 1421. File photo.
Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D-Suisun City is the author of AB 1421. File photo.

By Tanu Henry, California Black Media

California lawmakers are moving forward with a study to explore a mileage-based tax as a potential replacement for the state’s traditional gas tax — a shift supporters say is driven by declining fuel tax revenues as more drivers switch to fuel-efficient and electric vehicles.

The research, tied to Assembly Bill (AB) 1421, would extend and support work by the state’s Road Usage Charge Technical Advisory Committee through 2035.

Under current law, California depends heavily on revenue from the gas tax to fund roads, highways, and infrastructure, but those revenues are projected to shrink as electric vehicle use grows and overall gasoline consumption drops. The mileage study would look at a “road charge” system where drivers pay based on how many miles they drive, rather than how much gas they buy.

The bill does not yet enact a new tax. Instead, it extends the study and advisory work until 2035 and would have the Legislature receive findings and recommendations, with a report due by Jan. 1, 2027.

Republicans in the California Legislature have been vocal in their opposition. Assembly Republican Leader Heath Flora criticized the proposal.

“We already pay the highest gas taxes in the nation. Now Sacramento is talking about adding a new tax for every mile people drive,” Flora said. “Piling on another tax right now shows just how out of touch politicians in Sacramento are with the reality working families face.”

The plan has drawn broader GOP criticism from leaders outside the Legislature as well. California Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton called a mileage fee “absolutely outrageous” and said, if elected, he would veto the tax, adding that tracking and charging drivers for every mile is unacceptable.

Supporters say the study is a pragmatic response to long-term funding challenges.

On the Assembly Floor on Jan. 29, Assemblymember Lori Wilson (D–Suisun City), the bill’s author, said that California’s transportation funding is “becoming less stable, less equitable, and less sustainable as more drivers switch to fuel-efficient and zero-emission vehicles.”

“Drivers using the same roads often pay different amounts for that use,” Wilson continued. “Low income and rural commuters who must drive farther and less efficient vehicles can pay more while others contribute less despite roadway impacts.”

Wilson and other supporters contend that a per-mile road charge could ensure that all drivers contribute fairly to the costs of maintaining roads, regardless of the type of vehicle they drive.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of February 4 – 10, 2026

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of February 4 – 10, 2026

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of January 28, 2025 – February 3, 2026

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of January 28, 2025 – February 3, 2026

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.